Home / Blogs

The Future of Religions on the Internet

A statistical approach to the ICANN new gTLD program

Internet is facing the biggest change in its history. New brands, ideas, groups, communities,... have now found the chance to apply for their own specific space on internet naming system through ICANN’s new gTLD program.

One of the most interesting points of this courageous program was the motivation it created among communities to try to represent their specific webspace on the internet by applying for their own TLD; and among them were the religious communities as well.

Regardless of the major questions of “who the applicants are?” and “whether they have the competency to hold a religious TLD or not?”, the fact that religious communities are interested in presence on the internet made me curious about the position of the religious TLDs against each other in the future of internet, so I did a statistical investigation on the current new gTLD applications.

The results were interesting.

Among all 1930 applications, I found 17 applications related to religious concepts (please comment if I have missed something):

  • TLDs categorized as main religious ones:   Christian TLDs: .BIBLE / .CHURCH (2 applications)   Islamic TLDs: .ISLAM
  • TLDs related to subsidiaries of a religion:   Christian subsidiaries: .CATHOLIC / ???????. / .??????? / .??? / .CBN / .LDS / .MORMON   Islamic subsidiaries: .IMAMAT / .SHIA / .ISMAILI / .UMMAH
  • Other related TLDs:   Islamic: .HALAL   Jewish: .KOSHER
    • This explains that Christians may own 56.25% of all religious TLDs, Muslims may have 37.5% and Jews may only have 6.25% of the share. But if we just count the main religious terms and subsidiaries, Christians will again have the majority by 66.6% of applications (60% of TLDs) in comparison to Muslims with 33.3% of applications (40% of TLDs) and Jews do not have any share in this category. I also had an investigation on the TLDs related to Islamic concepts in comparison to those contrary to Islamic values (including pornographic, gambling and alcoholic drinks’ TLDs), according to Islamic laws; and the results were even more interesting. Here are the results:
      • TLDs related to pornography: 9 applications (5 TLDs)
      • TLDs related to gambling: 17 applications (7 TLDs)
      • TLDs related to alcoholic drinks: 8 applications (4 TLDs)

      Totally 34 applications for 16 TLDs in comparison to 6…

By Shahram Soboutipour, Indipendent IT Business Adviser

Filed Under

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

VINTON CERF
Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Comments

.UMMAH is not subsidiary of Islam Katim S. Touray  –  Jan 23, 2013 2:11 AM

Shahram, .UMMAH is not a subsidiary of Islam, as you wrongly have it categorized in your article.  .UMMAH is a TLD aimed at the global Islamic community (Ummah), and all aiming to reach that community.  It is not aimed at, nor is, any particular Islamic sect such as Sunni or Shia. Other than that, yours is an informative and interesting article.  Thanks!

Katim, you are right, but my categorization Shahram Soboutipour  –  Jan 23, 2013 6:43 AM

Katim, you are right, but my categorization on the main religious TLDs here means those names which exactly present the name of the religion or their main holly book. Besides "Ummah" is not commonly used between some sects (e.g. between Shia's). I think the important fact about these statistics is that it shows that the Christians have been more active (or maybe better informed) in the new gTLD program.

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

Related

Topics

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API