Home / Blogs

How Should I Present .Brand Domains in Advertising? (Part 1)

Do consumers still get confused when they see a URL without a .com (or other traditional extension)?

Probably—but I don’t think anyone really knows the answer to that from a global perspective.

What I do know, however, is that it’s important for those of us in the new TLD industry to help our brand customers ensure that we’re providing audiences with the best possible chance to identify new domains as legitimate web addresses.

One question that frequently arises in our conversations with .brands is about just how to represent .brand URLs to maximize audience understanding, recall, and action when used in advertising or promotional material.

The short answer is that there are a number of ways to represent .brand domains, each with its own advantages and challenges—and the best fit is based upon the media in which it will be displayed and the action you want your audience to take.

So let’s have a look at a few of the options that we’ve seen to date and see if we can uncover what the best option is for you.

* * *


Traditionally, use of the ‘www’ was seen as the preferred method to ensure that the audience identified the text as a domain name. Many will also recall the http:// also being used interchangeably in days gone by.

As browsers have improved over time, the requirement for users to type the ‘www’ and/or the ‘http://’ has been eliminated and thus, many advertisers simply use the simplified domain in their creative these days.

When it comes to advertising new .brand URLs however, many have reverted back to the use of the ‘www’ to help train audiences that this is, in fact, a legitimate web address. This avoids confusion in situations where ‘dots’ are used as creative devices rather than functional elements of a domain name.

For example, Neustar has opted to include the ‘www’ wherever possible when using its .brand.

The plus side

  • Helps the address to look like a domain name and conveys immediately that this is a web address and works well in spoken form
  • Globally acknowledged standard

The down side

  • Can extend the length of the web address, potentially making it less appealing for visual or text-based ads
  • Not required in browsers any longer, so potentially seen as outdated by some audience segments

* * *


As discussed above, using ‘http://’ is a slightly more outdated version of the ‘www’ option but does establish well-understood URL elements to illustrate that despite the unfamiliar extension, this is a real domain name.

The plus side

  • Looks like a domain name and conveys immediately that this is a web address

The down side

  • Looks overly technical and not as attractive in written form and clunky when spoken aloud
  • Again, not required in browsers any longer, but potentially seen as outdated a little more than the ‘www’.

* * *

Domain only labels <something>.brand

This option eschews any prefix and instead focuses on the domain itself. Some brands have made a conscious decision to support this option, most likely seeking to reinforce the simplicity of the ‘something.something’ vernacular that new TLDs provide as memorable options for the end user. Whilst many have chosen to have the www record created but focus on the domain only labels in advertising, some have gone further and not even created the www record.

To illustrate, the Australian Football League’s women’s competition site is accessible from www.womens.afl and womens.afl—yet the promotional signage on the stadium shows just womens.afl.

The plus side

  • Short and simple, which is good for audience recall and looks more attractive when presented visually
  • Works towards the long term cognitive approach desired by .brand applicants – think product.brand, promo.brand etc.

The down side

  • Potential for confusion if audiences don’t understand it is a domain
  • Potential loss of traffic if www. record isn’t created as well

* * *


Similar to the use of a phone icon to symbolize telephone number or an envelope to signify mailing address, a computer or tablet icon can be a simple, visual way to indicate that the text that follows can be typed into a browser.

The plus side

  • Visually appealing
  • Identifies that it is a web address
  • Still ensures the benefits of the Domain only label, but uses widely understood symbols for customer benefit

The down side

  • Potential for confusion if audiences don’t understand it is a web address

* * *

Search symbol

In the same vein as symbols, positioning the domain (with or without ‘www’) next to a search symbol is another way to illustrate to users how it should be treated—just type it in and go!

With most browser bars now having builtin search functionality, this also serves as a double purpose for those seeking to get the user back to the browser bar.

Variations of this may also include a cursor icon. While search and direct navigation by domain name have traditionally been seen as opponents, typing a domain into a browser bar achieves the same outcome of delivering visitors directly to the content and educating them that this is a quicker way to get where they want.

The plus side

  • Clear demonstration of the action you want your audience to take – i.e. go to the browser and type in the domain

The down side

  • May not work in all media and still potential to create confusion between direct navigation and search

* * *

Written instructions

Including a written call to action before the domain (which again may or may not include ‘www’) is another way to make it clear to your audience what action you want them to take. Phrases such as “find us at…”, “type…” or “go to…” are commonly used in the communication of web addresses and therefore tie into users’ previous understanding that what follows is a domain name they can visit.

The plus side

  • Gives audience a clear instruction for what action to take and works well when spoken aloud

The down side

  • More lengthy, requiring more space in visual ads and potentially more cumbersome in design

* * *

So how do I choose?

As you can see, there are many options for how domain names, in general, can be displayed in advertising, and .brand domains carry their own peculiarities relating to audience comprehension and recall. While different approaches may be preferred by different brands, there are a number of common criteria you can use to select which option works for your brand—considering your audience, your desired behavior and the medium you are advertising in.

I’ll address the elements you need to consider when choosing the best approach for you in my next article on this topic.

A version of this post was originally published on MakeWay.World.

By Tony Kirsch, Head of Professional Services at GoDaddy Registry

Filed Under


Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet



New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global


Sponsored byVerisign