Home / Blogs

The Start of Something Big: ICANN Announces Planning for Round Two of New gTLDs

ICANN has published a short paper in advance of its 65th meeting in Marrakech which starts on 23 June 2019. Entitled, “ICANN Org’s Readiness to Support Future Rounds of New gTLDs,” it describes ICANN’s working assumptions for “policy implementation and operational readiness for a subsequent round of new gTLDs”. The document is necessary for ICANN to move forward with essential preparations for the next round. It is a thin document—only five pages—so the assumptions are high level, but they provide some useful insight to those brands thinking about applying for a top-level domain in the future or the protection of their marks.

They include:

  • Board approval of the policy recommendations emanating from the Subsequent Procedures Working Group (SubPro WG). We believe the policy recommendations will be delivered to the Board in the second quarter of 2020.
  • A fresh operational infrastructure will be created (new people, new processes and new systems, all built on one of ICANN’s existing systems—as opposed to the one-off custom-made solution used in 2012)
  • The expectation that the costs of the new program will be covered by the application fee. A new financial model will be developed in order to track development/costs from the earliest stage which can be utilised on an ongoing basis.
  • A communications and awareness campaign to be run to raise awareness
  • An assumption that there will be about 2,000 applications when the application window opens (similar to the amount received in 2012), with “significantly lower” volumes for ongoing applications in subsequent rounds.
  • A suggestion that only 1,000 applications a year will be delegated to ensure the stability of the DNS. However, recent work within the SubPro WG seems to indicate that a greater amount of applications could be delegated per year if ICANN has the capacity to evaluate a greater number of applications. In either case, the community through SubPro will need to recommend a fair means of prioritising applications.
  • The initial application window will probably be open for one to three months with “subsequent application windows opening during the same timeframe, one per calendar year”. This makes it clear that ICANN is assuming that there will not only be more than one additional round, but that such rounds will be implemented on a predictable recurring annual basis.
  • There will be a new applicant guidebook which will outline changes to the program implementation based on the SubPro PDP that is looking to complete its work by the end of 2019.
  • ICANN’s staff will be trained up on all new processes and tools with some critical functions such as application evaluation and objection processing being outsourced “to expert firms with requisite experience” as was the case in the 2012 round.
  • New full-time staff and some temporary assistance will be hired based on “needed skills and experience”
  • The program will be run on a cost-recovery basis. There is no indication of what the application fee will be yet.

This is an important milestone for ICANN to begin to plan and budget for the continuation of ICANN’s New gTLD Program. Although there is still a lot of work that needs to be completed in the policy process itself, making progress on planning for implementation is essential to ensure that ICANN will be in a position to launch the program without undue delay. This would be consistent with how ICANN began planning for implementation for the 2012 new gTLD round prior to the completion of that policy development process.

In the 2012 round, Com Laude/Valideus managed 73 of the 75 new gTLD applications that were awarded the maximum score of 100% from the ICANN evaluators because we invested heavily in understanding a complex and changeable application system. From the look of it, ICANN wants the next and all subsequent rounds to be more predictable and transparent.

If ICANN manages to create a simpler, faster and less-expensive application process than in 2012, there are trademark owners across the globe who might apply for a closed Dot Brand registry to protect their IP and to gain more control over their digital destiny.

Click here to see all of the assumptions.

By Nick Wood, Executive Chairman & Founder at Com Laude

Filed Under

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet


I found it interesting that during a Norman Payne  –  Jun 24, 2019 12:38 PM

I found it interesting that during a meeting of the Sub Pro Working Group, the group charged with launching the next round of new gTLDs, Co-chair and Com Laude employee Jeff Neuman told the group “I know that I am not paid by my employer to be on this call or chairing this group”.  Full transcript here - https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2019/transcript/transcript-subpro-11jun19-en.pdf

That’s quite laughable especially when the version of this piece on your own website touts his role at Co-Chair of the sub group. https://comlaude.com/icann-planning-round-2-new-gtlds/
There are plenty of true volunteers in the ICANN community.  Don’t denigrate their efforts with such statements.  Everyone know what he’s hired to do.

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.



IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPXO

Domain Management

Sponsored byMarkMonitor

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign


Sponsored byVerisign