|
Broadband; we want it, and we all depend on it; but where you live can impact access and adoption of the best that service providers have to offer. The FCC is looking to change both geographic and demographic limitations now plaguing the U.S. in the global race for broadband economic supremacy. Can a combination of a fixed and wireless-mobile strategy improve broadband economic viability by increasing access, adoption, and affordability across the broadband spectrum?
Geographic Limitations
The reality is significant, that where you live depends on the access and quality of broadband service available for most U.S consumers. Its impact is felt most positively in highly dense population areas like the Northeast and large urban centers where private companies have concentrated their efforts to capture lucrative and highly upward socio-economic demographics. This gives the most ROI (Return on Investment) for the large companies to provide the (best of the best) in broadband.
Demographic Limitations
On the other side of this equation are the less dense and less upwardly economic population centers. These are the rural areas where providing the best that broadband has to offer, is and continues to be, economically unviable to service providers. It is a matter of demand and supply, a consequence of our free economic system which relies on private capital to create goods and services which benefit us all. Without the infusion of capital directed to low income and less dense areas there will continue to be a wide gap of access and adoption of broadband in the U.S.
Access and Adoption
• The National Broadband Plan – The FCC has formulated a plan to incorporate an initiative to close the gap of the so called underserved with respect to broadband. It has addressed these issues by targeting areas of needed improvement in the telecommunications arena for the U.S.
• Universal Service Fund – A plan to redirect funds to broadband access, originally adopted to subsidize Telco providers to serve under populated areas with telephone service where the economics in providing this service was unfeasible.
• Spectrum Reallocation – A plan to reallocate spectrum from broadcasters and government entities which were not being utilized to wireless-mobile broadband initiatives.
• Broadband Stimulus Plan – Provide funding, approximately $7Billion, to encourage service providers to build broadband infrastructure into under-served areas. Funding was allocated through an extensive grant process to prove viability of the applicant.
• Net Neutrality – A controversial plan to provide equal and unencumbered access to broadband for all involved constituents
A Fixed and Wireless-Mobile Solution
In reality economic realities of wide-spread adoption of broadband continues to be sporadic due to the large investments service providers must make to realize a reasonable return on investment. Since competition brings prices down for consumers, operators are only willing to compete where the most attractive demographics and dense population centers exist.
With the advent of continued proliferation from wireless coverage throughout the U.S., and the projected exponential growth in mobile access, adoption and affordability through LTE to 4G technology; the realities of serving less populated areas becomes increasingly more likely. The strides being made in technology within the mobile arena can significantly impact the broadband community. Cisco White Paper (See LTE: Simplifying the Migration to 4G Networks):
• Mobile is highly competitive and requires less infrastructure thereby reducing capital outlays by service providers. This is the most promising solution along with fixed broadband to penetrate underserved areas in the near future.
• Mobile operators will continue upgrading back-haul infrastructure to enhance coverage and reliability within the network
• 4G technology will increase network efficiencies, economics, coverage, and enhancements to give users a top quality experience at a reasonable price
• A wireless revolution for both consumer and business dynamics with applications to improve energy consumption, travel efficiencies, educational opportunities, health diagnosis and monitoring, environmental solutions, and business processes will be a true reality in the near future.
The outlook of a fixed and wireless-mobile strategy to bring about widespread access and adoption of broadband to the masses, while significantly achieving a global and competitive reality for the U.S., cannot be over-stated.
Sponsored byVerisign
Sponsored byWhoisXML API
Sponsored byRadix
Sponsored byIPv4.Global
Sponsored byCSC
Sponsored byDNIB.com
Sponsored byVerisign
Even today, consumer-grade broadband wireless offerings fall shy of the speeds of most cable broadband and FTTH subscriptions. There’s no doubt that the speeds of broadband wireless today and will meet the internet-browsing needs of today, but will it hold up with an explosion of video use—TV, streaming, and video-conferencing? If we look at the triple-play today, voice and data work well on wireless, but video does not.
Hey Frank,
The mobile industry realizes the challenges that video will bring to the table and they are working hard to supply the infrastructure to meet those demands. Off-Loading and Back-Haul upgrades are continuing to raise the bar in mobile’s ability to meet the projected bandwidth requirements. The evolution to 4G will go a long way to provide speed and efficiencies needed to handle video requirements.
The Cable Industry will have an opportunity to capitalize on the anticipated mobile back-haul upgrades.
Mobile is a win-win situation for the broadband industry.
The video that the mobile industry provides can’t/won’t be what we see in our entertainment rooms of our home. They’ll have to be a small-screen experience with lower resolution and perhaps the use of caching.
So mobile broadband is good for mobile and nomadic use, but fixed wireless won’t be a replacement for all the advanced applications that wireline can provide.
Hey Frank,
I’m not speaking of a replacement for fixed wire-line broadband as an entertainment venue. What is being said is the advancements in wireless/mobile will allow for streaming video and can enhance the reach to rural areas where fixed wire-line is not available and is not conducive in ROI’s to make it available. The applications for energy savings, health-care initiatives, educational opportunities and B2B solutions will be available on wireless.
It will take a combination of wireless and fixed wire-line initiatives to get the US where it needs to be in broadband proliferation.