<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-03-31T21:29:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> Will Arrest Stem Tide of Spam? (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postswill_arrest_stem_tide_of_spam</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postswill_arrest_stem_tide_of_spam</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Legitimate email marketers, anti-spam groups and beleaguered recipients got a bit of good news with the arrest last week of a man described as one of the world's most prolific spammers. Robert Alan Soloway, 27, dubbed "the Seattle Spammer" by federal officials, was indicted on 35 charges related to fraudulent Internet activities. Soloway pleaded not guilty to all charges at his May 30 arraignment. You can read more <a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39287329,00.htm">here</a>. Although it's always great when a notorious spammer gets put out of business, such actions probably won't result in a drop in the amount of spam that gets sent... <a href="https://circleid.com/postswill_arrest_stem_tide_of_spam">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> News from the Authentication Summit in NYC (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsnews_from_the_authentication_summit_in_nyc</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsnews_from_the_authentication_summit_in_nyc</link>
		<description><![CDATA[At The Email Authentication Implementation Summit in New York City last week, several major ISPs surprised attendees with their announcement that they are jointly backing a single authentication standard. Yahoo!, Cisco, EarthLink, AOL, and Microsoft got together and announced they are submitting a new authentication solution, DomainKeys Identified Mail to the Internet Engineering Task Force for approval as a standard. This is big news... <a href="https://circleid.com/postsnews_from_the_authentication_summit_in_nyc">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Protecting Brands from Phishers No Easy Task (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsprotecting_brands_from_phishers_no_easy_task</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsprotecting_brands_from_phishers_no_easy_task</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Just in case you've been out of the country for the last 12 months, a new scourge is hitting the Internet and the world of email and it's called phishing. The Anti-Phishing Working Group defines phishing as identity theft "attacks using 'spoofed' e-mails and fraudulent Websites designed to fool recipients into divulging personal financial data such as credit card numbers, account usernames and passwords..." According to various experts, the incidents of phishing are rising at an alarming rate: there were 13,000 unique phishing attacks in January alone - that's a 42 percent surge over the previous month. The real problem is that phishing works. <a href="https://circleid.com/postsprotecting_brands_from_phishers_no_easy_task">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Does CAN-SPAM Really Matter? (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsdoes_can_spam_really_matter</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsdoes_can_spam_really_matter</link>
		<description><![CDATA[As a daily and enthusiastic reader of The New York Times, I was disappointed to read their February 1 article on CAN-SPAM entitled, "Law Barring Junk E-Mail Allows a Flood Instead" (subscription required). The theme of the article was, as the title suggests, that enacting CAN-SPAM was worse than having no laws at all. The article really missed the point on several fronts. <a href="https://circleid.com/postsdoes_can_spam_really_matter">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>