<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-04-10T19:13:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> Wrong on the "Exaflood," Wrong on Network Neutrality (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postswrong_on_the_exaflood_wrong_on_network_neutrality</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postswrong_on_the_exaflood_wrong_on_network_neutrality</link>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2007, Johna Till Johnson, president of Nemertes Research, published a paper that hyped a so-called "Exaflood" - a kooky Discovery Institute idea about how the Internet would drown in its own data. The Nemertes press release on the paper was widely reported in newspapers. It described itself as a "... landmark study ... groundbreaking analysis ... evidence the exaflood is coming... It said: "The findings indicate that by 2010 ... users could increasingly encounter Internet "brownouts" or interruptions to the applications they've become accustomed to using on the internet." <a href="https://circleid.com/postswrong_on_the_exaflood_wrong_on_network_neutrality">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-10T12:13:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Making Network Neutrality Sustainable, Revisited (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20090921_making_network_neutrality_sustainable_revisited</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20090921_making_network_neutrality_sustainable_revisited</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Today FCC Chairman Genichowski <a href="http://openinternet.gov/read-speech.html">announced</a> that the FCC's Network Neutrality Proceeding is entering the rule-making stage. This is a historic milestone, worth celebrating, but the milestone is on a road with hairpin turns. If you look directly above us, you can see we're in almost exactly the same place we used to be when the pro-competition provisions of the 1996 Telecom Act were intact and the distinction between telecommunications service and information service was meaningful, but now we are a lot lower. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20090921_making_network_neutrality_sustainable_revisited">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-10T12:13:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Verizon Throws 18 States Under the Progress Train (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20090917_verizon_throws_18_states_under_progress_train</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20090917_verizon_throws_18_states_under_progress_train</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a happy Verizon FIOS fiber-to-the-home customer in Connecticut, I admire the long view Verizon took to build its FIOS infrastructure, and I appreciate the substantial punishment that Verizon took from Wall Street until it became obvious that FIOS would be a huge success. But Verizon is not building FIOS in all of its territories! Verizon is unloading land lines in eighteen states because they don't want to keep building FIOS there... <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20090917_verizon_throws_18_states_under_progress_train">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-10T12:13:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> More Questions About WSJ Claims of Iran DPI (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20090625_questions_wsj_claims_of_iran_dpi</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20090625_questions_wsj_claims_of_iran_dpi</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124562668777335653.html">Wall Street Journal's dubious story</a> about Iran's use of Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) for spying, censorship and disinformation appears in a highly charged atmosphere. The US Republican right wing wants the US to talk tougher to Iran, to bomb-bomb-bomb, invade, or commit "regime change." More questions than mine have surfaced about the WSJ's story... <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20090625_questions_wsj_claims_of_iran_dpi">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-10T12:13:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> It's Official: Value Moving to Edge (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsits_official_value_moving_to_edge</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsits_official_value_moving_to_edge</link>
		<description><![CDATA[It's official. A team of market analysts from Oppenheimer are <a href="http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1102609205272&s=436&e=001LXDPuj0VeAS0qDgrE-Irh1Z_k4vyKwx4sESeo-FBHYjGzaIQty_76jl-sUss6DNREGnRJnHNjesvLqWyH8s30bcKTdF_xCn_Jh6No4NOexfXAT-MA50ZkzZ5_xWL6XnF-GrUWCKq_TmIghzcjU9KOGSs1KAKaXEY3neW3E63poCyK-Z1wGBFVhtYLLVVq25L">saying</a> [PDF] what I've been <a href="http://isen.com/stupid.html">saying since 1997</a>, that the apps are separating from the network, and this is driving a wave of "explosive innovation." <a href="https://circleid.com/postsits_official_value_moving_to_edge">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-10T12:13:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Crawford Likes Aussie Utility Network (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20090527_crawford_likes_aussie_utility_network</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20090527_crawford_likes_aussie_utility_network</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Susan Crawford, special assistant to the president for science, technology and innovation policy and a member of the National Economic Council, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/congressdaily/cd_20090202_7042.php">is reported to be favorably inclined</a> towards a U.S. network much like Australia's recently announced $33B broadband plan. Of course, the U.S. is some 15 times bigger than Australia, and that'd make the price tag closer to $500B by straight multiplication. But the U.S. would get a fiber network done right... <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20090527_crawford_likes_aussie_utility_network">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-10T12:13:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> TWC Does the Right Thing - Again! (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20090421_twc_does_the_right_thing_again</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20090421_twc_does_the_right_thing_again</link>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to customer feedback, Time Warner Cable has discontinued its trials of tiered Internet service. [Corporate Announcement <a href="http://www.timewarnercable.com/corporate/announcements/cbb.html">here</a>.] It was quite a stuff-storm, but to TWC's credit, they put their finger up, felt the howling gale, and changed course right away. This is in marked contrast to their larger competitor, Comcast... <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20090421_twc_does_the_right_thing_again">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-10T12:13:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Dumb When They Want To Be... (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20090217_crtc_dumb_when_they_want_to_be</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20090217_crtc_dumb_when_they_want_to_be</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://davidakin.blogware.com/">David Akin</a> pointed me to <a href="http://www.ottawacitizen.com/Technology/CRTC+takes/1294111/story.html">this article in the Ottawa Citizen</a> which describes CRTC initiatives aimed at getting the cablecos to pay into a fund that would support, "the creation of high-quality, high-cost, scripted Canadian broadcasting content in the new media." In it, Ken Engelhart, senior vice-president of regulatory [affairs?] for Rogers Corp. is quoted saying... <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20090217_crtc_dumb_when_they_want_to_be">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-10T12:13:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Fixing the Internet Might Break It Worse Than It's Broken Now (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20090215_fixing_internet_break_worse_than_broken_now</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20090215_fixing_internet_break_worse_than_broken_now</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.willisalanramsey.com/">Willis Alan Ramsey</a>, who wrote "Muskrat Love," recorded one and only one studio album. The cognoscenti of country think it's a gem, an all time top ten. There's an apocryphal story that when Ramsey was pushed to make another record he allegedly retorted, "What's wrong with the first one?" We who use the Internet every day risk losing sight of what a miracle it is, and the openness that keeps it so miraculous... We also lose sight of the fact that even as the Internet's miracles occur, it's almost always broken or malfunctioning or threatening or worse in many places along the line. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20090215_fixing_internet_break_worse_than_broken_now">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-10T12:13:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Benkler Analyzes Broadband in Stimulus Bills (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20090202_benkler_analyzes_broadband_stimulus_bills</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20090202_benkler_analyzes_broadband_stimulus_bills</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Yochai Benkler has done a close reading of the broadband portions of both House and Senate stimulus bills. <a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/01/30/broadband_stimulus/">Nice work</a>. To summarize Yochai's summary: House: $6 Billion, split between Commerce and Agriculture Depts., requires adherence to FCC's Four Internet Principles (the Martin FCC Version); Senate: $9 Billion, via Commerce Department's NTIA, requires less specific "interconnection and nondiscrimination." How much broadband can a Billion buy? <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20090202_benkler_analyzes_broadband_stimulus_bills">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-10T12:13:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> The Meanings of Network Neutrality (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20081228_meanings_of_network_neutrality</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20081228_meanings_of_network_neutrality</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed Felten has <a href="http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/felten/three-flavors-net-neutrality">posted a nice taxonomy</a> of the several meanings people take when they use the term Network Neutrality, briefly: End-to-End Design; Nonexclusionary Business Practice; Content Nondiscrimination ... I've been developing a taxonomy of issues that interact with and are bound with Network Neutrality. So far there are six items... <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20081228_meanings_of_network_neutrality">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-10T12:13:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> What If I Were Wrong About Edge-Caching? (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20081216_what_if_wrong_about_edge_caching</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20081216_what_if_wrong_about_edge_caching</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Nicholas Thompson at Wired Blog <a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2008/12/wsj-wtf.html">sums up</a> yesterday's Wall Street Journal piece on Google. To summarize his summary: Google's edge caching isn't new or evil; Lessig didn't shift gears on NN; Microsoft and Yahoo have been off the NN bandwagon since 2006; The Obama team still supports NN; Amazon's Kindle support is consistent with its NN support. Yet... yet... <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20081216_what_if_wrong_about_edge_caching">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-10T12:13:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Bogus WSJ Story on Net Neutrality (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20081215_bogus_wsj_story_on_net_neutrality</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20081215_bogus_wsj_story_on_net_neutrality</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Today's Wall Street Journal has a bogus, misleading story claiming that Google has been making deals with telephone and cable carriers that violate Network Neutrality. My BS detector was triggered by paragraph five, which reads: "One major cable operator in talks with Google says it has been reluctant so far to strike a deal because of concern it might violate Federal Communications Commission guidelines on network neutrality. 'If we did this, Washington would be on fire,' says one executive at the cable company who is familiar with the talks..." <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20081215_bogus_wsj_story_on_net_neutrality">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-10T12:13:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Fiber Optics: Thinking It Through (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20081114_fiber_optics_thinking_it_through</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20081114_fiber_optics_thinking_it_through</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Doc Searls has an essay about bringing fiber optics to every home in America. It is aimed in the right direction, but makes a couple of mistakes on the numbers and falls to ground way short of its target. It troubles me that I appear to be the sole source for Doc's numbers (on the basis of some informal conversation and my Telecom Day speech in Wellington NZ last May). This post is an attempt to correct the record, and to create one where my previous thinking has been private. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20081114_fiber_optics_thinking_it_through">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-10T12:13:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Beyond White Spaces (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20081023_beyond_white_spaces</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20081023_beyond_white_spaces</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in 1999 I wrote a <a href="http://www.isen.com/papers/edge/devices.html">column</a> that envisioned the uses of digital wireless in the home. I compared two nascent, much-touted wireless protocols, Bluetooth and HomeRF. I completely, totally, slippery-dash missed Wi-Fi. There had been a public 802.11 spec since 1997. The first 802.11b devices, which made Wi-Fi popular, burst onto the scene in early 2000, just a few short months after my clueless insights. Today HomeRF is forgotten, Bluetooth is for ugly ear jewelry and Wi-Fi rulz... <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20081023_beyond_white_spaces">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-10T12:13:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>