<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-03-31T21:29:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> A True Final Ultimate Solution to the Spam Problem? (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20110520_a_true_final_ultimate_solution_to_the_spam_problem</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20110520_a_true_final_ultimate_solution_to_the_spam_problem</link>
		<description><![CDATA[A common acronym in spam-fighting is <a href="http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html">FUSSP</a> -- Final Ultimate Solution to the Spam Problem. It's used (usually derisively) to describe the latest proposed scheme to end spam once and for all. Usually these schemes are based on false assumptions or have already been tried with no results. This time - be still, my beating heart - it looks like some researchers at the University of California might really be on to something. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20110520_a_true_final_ultimate_solution_to_the_spam_problem">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> More on 'Researchers Hijack Storm Worm to Track Profits' (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20081110_researchers_hijack_storm_worm_spam</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20081110_researchers_hijack_storm_worm_spam</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Always good for information on the spam economy, Brian Krebs of the Washington Post has just published a truly fascinating article: <em>Researchers Hijack Storm Worm to Track Profits</em>. Bottom line: a one-in-twelve-million conversion rate of spam to sales seems to be enough to keep the spam economy going. The article covers a project by researchers at UC San Diego and UC Berkeley, who managed to infiltrate the Storm Worm bot network and take over a small portion of it. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20081110_researchers_hijack_storm_worm_spam">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Wikileaks Calls for Boycott of Domain Registrar eNom (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts831110_wikileaks_boycott_domain_registrar_enom</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts831110_wikileaks_boycott_domain_registrar_enom</link>
		<description><![CDATA[In the aftermath of the shutdown of Wikileaks.org by a court order issued at the request of Swiss Bank <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_Julius_Baer">Julius Baer</a>, Wikileaks has called for the boycott of registrar eNom. eNom is best known as the domain registrar that complied with the federal government's order to <a hef="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/us/04bar.html">shut down a Spanish travel agency</a> because it did business with Cuba -- the agency was not under U.S. jurisdiction and so was hardly violating U.S. law, but their domain was registered in the United States, and that was good enough for the feds. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts831110_wikileaks_boycott_domain_registrar_enom">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Don't Register Your Domain in the U.S. if it's Controversial (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts83420_controversial_domain_names</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts83420_controversial_domain_names</link>
		<description><![CDATA[In the news lately have been a number of incidents where U.S. courts, or the U.S. government itself has ordered domain registrars to shut down free speech. First was the <a href="http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/search/label/E360">E360 vs Spamhaus</a> case, in which accused spammer <a href="http://www.rahul.net/falk/quickrefh.html#david_linhardt">E360 Insight</a> sued anti-spam organization <a href="http://www.spamhaus.org/">Spamhaus</a> for labeling them as spammers and won by default when Spamhaus insisted that U.S. courts did not have jurisdiction over them in England and didn't appear. Unfortunately, U.S. courts <em>did</em> have jurisdiction over Spamhaus' domain registrar, who was nearly ordered to shut Spamhaus down (a court order was under consideration). Fortunately, Spamhaus was able to move their registration overseas before any shutdown order could be issued... <a href="https://circleid.com/posts83420_controversial_domain_names">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Ameritrade Leaks User Information Yet Again, Blames Hacker X (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts791712_ameritrade_leak_hacker_x</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts791712_ameritrade_leak_hacker_x</link>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, you know things are getting bad when <a href="http://www.rahul.net/falk/quickrefa.html#ameritrade">Ameritrade</a> leaks its customer information <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/news.admin.net-abuse.email/browse_frm/thread/228f162945caef99/"><strong>yet again</strong></a>, and I don't even bother to report it because it's not news anymore. Well, recent updates to the story have prompted me to correct that omission. Yes, it happened again. Roughly a month ago, correspondents began to receive <a href="http://www.rahul.net/falk/glossary.html#pumpndump">pump-n-dump</a> spam to tagged email addresses which they had given only to Ameritrade... This now marks the third major confirmed leak of customer information from Ameritrade. In addition, the <em>Inquirer</em> <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=22662">reported</a> the loss of 200,000 Ameritrade client files in February 2005. One correspondent informs me that this has happened to him on four or five previous occasions. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts791712_ameritrade_leak_hacker_x">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Phishers Now Targeting Domain Registrars (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts070807_phishing_domain_name_registration</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts070807_phishing_domain_name_registration</link>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an issue of some concern and should be watched carefully: phishers are now trying to get passwords of domain registrants (domain owners). Currently, correspondents inform me that GoDaddy is the target, but there's no reason to think the phishers won't expand to other registrars. Normally, phishers go after bank accounts or other financial information, or sometimes the online accounts of users so that they may send spam. It's not known precisely why phishers are after domain registration information, but the possibilities are chilling... <a href="https://circleid.com/posts070807_phishing_domain_name_registration">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>