<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-04-30T19:14:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> The Perpetual Peril of Open Platforms (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20090116_perpetual_peril_open_platforms</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20090116_perpetual_peril_open_platforms</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Over at Techdirt, Mike Masnick did a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081224/1056543219.shtml">great post</a> a few weeks back on a theme I've <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080419/150606895.shtml">written about</a> before: peoples' tendency to underestimate the robustness of open platforms. "Once people have a taste for what that openness allows, stuffing it back into a box is very difficult. Yes, it's important to remain vigilant, and yes, people will always attempt to shut off that openness, citing all sorts of "dangers" and "bad things" that the openness allows..." <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20090116_perpetual_peril_open_platforms">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-30T12:14:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> More Privacy, Bit by Bit (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20090105_yahoo_more_privacy_bit_by_bit</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20090105_yahoo_more_privacy_bit_by_bit</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Before the Holidays, Yahoo got a flurry of good press for the announcement that it would (as the <em>LA Times</em> puts it) "purge user data after 90 days." My eagle-eyed friend Julian Sanchez noticed that the "purge" was less complete than privacy advocates might have hoped. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20090105_yahoo_more_privacy_bit_by_bit">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-30T12:14:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Does Your House Need a Tail? (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20081125_does_your_house_need_a_tail</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20081125_does_your_house_need_a_tail</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Thus far, the debate over broadband deployment has generally been between those who believe that private telecom incumbents should be in charge of planning, financing and building next-generation broadband infrastructure, and those who advocate a larger role for government in the deployment of broadband infrastructure... Tim Wu and Derek Slater have a great new paper out that approaches the problem from a different perspective: that broadband deployments could be planned and financed not by government or private industry, but by consumers themselves. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20081125_does_your_house_need_a_tail">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-30T12:14:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>