<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-03-31T21:29:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> IMP Continuing Despite Industry Backlash (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20100216_imp_continuing_despite_industry_backlash</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20100216_imp_continuing_despite_industry_backlash</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in November 2008 a colleague of mine, Neil Watson (Head of Operations at Entanet International Ltd), published an article on Entanet's opinion blog about the government's proposed plans to centrally store records of all electronic communications throughout the UK. The Interception Modernisation Programme (IMP) will be the largest surveillance system ever created in the UK and calls for a 'live tap' to be placed on every electronic communication in Britain including telephone calls, emails and visited websites. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20100216_imp_continuing_despite_industry_backlash">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> USC: Solving the Digital Divide? (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20090618_usc_solving_the_digital_divide</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20090618_usc_solving_the_digital_divide</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Like many in the UK communications industry my colleagues and I at Entanet have been eagerly awaiting the Digital Britain report. Darren Farnden, Entanet's Head of Marketing, has posted an interesting assessment of key parts of the report at <a href="http://opinion.enta.net" title="Entanet Opinion Blog">opinion.enta.net</a>. Given the content of Darren's article I thought it would be useful to post it in full here for CircleID readers... <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20090618_usc_solving_the_digital_divide">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Will ENUM Deliver? (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20090323_will_enum_deliver</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20090323_will_enum_deliver</link>
		<description><![CDATA[ENUM (E.164 NUmber Mapping) is a technology that has been around for a little while that has promised much and, so far, delivered little to the average user. As Nominet has recently been awarded the contract to administer the UK 4.4.e164.arpa delegation, I thought it was time that I put my thoughts on this subject down in writing. I'm going to cover the potential of ENUM in the telecoms industry and what it could mean to you, along with how it is currently being used and what potential security issues surround ENUM. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20090323_will_enum_deliver">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>