<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-04-17T18:55:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> Why You Shouldn't Believe Network Speed Tests (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20200712-why-you-shouldnt-believe-network-speed-tests</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20200712-why-you-shouldnt-believe-network-speed-tests</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The media is filled with hyperbolic claims that "Our network is the fastest!" And there are many so-called "Speed Test" tools available on the Internet. Most are easily run in a web browser. Should you trust those tools? Not really. The popular speed testing tools provide a very narrow and limited measure of network "speed." It is quite possible that a network that is rated as "fast" could actually deliver poor results to many applications. Why is this so? <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20200712-why-you-shouldnt-believe-network-speed-tests">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-17T11:55:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Domain Names Are Fading From User View (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20170428_domain_names_are_fading_from_user_view</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20170428_domain_names_are_fading_from_user_view</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The internet has changed and evolved ever since it's ancestors first came to life in the late 1960's. Some technology fades away and is forgotten; other aspects continue but are overlaid, like geological sediments, so that they are now longer visible but are still present under the surface. The Domain Name System - both the technology of DNS and the deployed naming hierarchy we all use - are among those aspects of the internet that, although they feel solid and immutable, are slowly changing underneath our feet. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20170428_domain_names_are_fading_from_user_view">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-17T11:55:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Internet: Quo Vadis (Where are you going?) (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20160714_internet_quo_vadis_where_are_you_going</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20160714_internet_quo_vadis_where_are_you_going</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Articles, blogs, and meetings about the internet of the future are filled with happy, positive words like "global", "uniform", and "open". The future internet is described in ways that seem as if taken from a late 1960's Utopian sci-fi novel: the internet is seen as overcoming petty rivalries between countries, dissolving social rank, equalizing wealth, and bringing universal justice. If that future is to be believed, the only obstacle standing between us and an Arcadian world of peace and harmony is that the internet does not yet reach everyone... <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20160714_internet_quo_vadis_where_are_you_going">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-17T11:55:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> NTIA on IoT - ICANN 2? And Reconsidering IoT as Distributed Process Control (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20160411_ntia_on_iot_icann_2</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20160411_ntia_on_iot_icann_2</link>
		<description><![CDATA[NTIA has published a Notice for Public comment that is titled "The Benefits, Challenges, and Potential Roles for the Government in Fostering the Advancement of the Internet of Things". This could become ICANN-2, bigger, longer, and uncut; and with a much greater impact on the future direction of the internet. However, my thoughts on this go well beyond the possibility of another ICANN. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20160411_ntia_on_iot_icann_2">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-17T11:55:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> What's Wrong With the FCC's Consumer Broadband Test? (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20100315_whats_wrong_with_the_fccs_consumer_broadband_test</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20100315_whats_wrong_with_the_fccs_consumer_broadband_test</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The FCC recently published some tools to let consumers measure some internet characteristics. The context is the FCC's "National Broadband Plan". I guess the FCC wants to gather data about the kind of internet users receive today so that the National Broadband Plan, whatever it may turn out to be, actually improves on the status quo. The motivation is nice but the FCC's methodology is technically weak. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20100315_whats_wrong_with_the_fccs_consumer_broadband_test">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-17T11:55:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Network Neutrality, UPS, and FedEx (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsnetwork_neutrality_ups_and_fedex</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsnetwork_neutrality_ups_and_fedex</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I buy a lot of things that are delivered by UPS or FedEx. And I kinda like to watch the progress of the shipments. Now we all know that UPS and FedEx have different grades of service -- Overnight, Two Day, Three Day, etc. And faster deliver costs more. Several years ago UPS and FedEx would frequently deliver a Two Day package the next day, i.e. they would effectively elevate the class of service. <a href="https://circleid.com/postsnetwork_neutrality_ups_and_fedex">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-17T11:55:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Google Buys VeriSign (not really) (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsgoogle_buys_verisign_not</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsgoogle_buys_verisign_not</link>
		<description><![CDATA[No that's not really happening, Google is not buying VeriSign. But given Google's ravenous appetite for data, it might find VeriSign quite attractive. VeriSign has both root domain name servers and servers for the .com and .net top level domains (TLDs). VeriSign could data mine the queries coming into those servers and produce a very valuable real-time stream of what users on the net are doing... Google just <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070709/ap_on_bi_ge/google_postini_4">bought</a> Postini -- and one would have to be fairly naive to believe that Google does not intend to dredge through all... <a href="https://circleid.com/postsgoogle_buys_verisign_not">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-17T11:55:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Putting Some Circuit Breakers Into DNS to Protect The Net (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postscircuit_breakers_dns_protect</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postscircuit_breakers_dns_protect</link>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a lot of bad, but smart, people out there on the net. They are quick to find and capitalize on vulnerabilities, particularly those vulnerabilities in mass market software. These bad folks are quite creative when it comes to making it hard to locate and shutdown the computers involved. For example, a virus that takes over a victim's computer might communicate with its control point, or send its captured/stolen information, by looking up a domain name. Normally domain names are somewhat static - the addresses they map to don't change very frequently - typically changes occur over periods measured in months or longer. <a href="https://circleid.com/postscircuit_breakers_dns_protect">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-17T11:55:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Are We Slowly Losing Control of the Internet? (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postslosing_control_of_the_internet</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postslosing_control_of_the_internet</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I have long been intrigued by the question of how do we turn the internet into a lifeline grade infrastructure... My hope that this will occur soon or even within decades is diminishing. Most of us observe, almost daily, how even well established infrastructures tend to crumble when stressed, even slightly... I was at the O'Reilly Etel conference last week. The content was impressive and the people there were frequently the primary actors in the creation and deployment of VOIP. However, not once during the three days did I hear a serious discussion by a speaker or in the hallways about how this evolving system would be managed, monitored, diagnosed, or repaired. <a href="https://circleid.com/postslosing_control_of_the_internet">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-17T11:55:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Internet Zombies (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsinternet_zombies</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsinternet_zombies</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Today on <a href="http://archives.listbox.com/247/">Dave Farber's IP list</a>, someone revived the ancient argument that ICANN imposes limits on the number of top level domains (TLDs) because to have more than a few will cause DNS to wobble and cause the internet to collapse. Although long discredited, that argument hangs around like a zombie. ICANN has never been able to adduce a shred of proof that there is anything to support that assertion... <a href="https://circleid.com/postsinternet_zombies">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-17T11:55:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Questioning "Net Neutrality" (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsquestioning_net_neutrality</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsquestioning_net_neutrality</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm kinda foxed by the some of the discussion going on about "Net Neutrality". The internet was designed from the outset <u><em>not</em></u> to be content neutral. Even before there was an IP protocol there were precedence flags in the NCP packet headers. And the IP (the <em>Internet Protocol</em>) has always had 8 bits that are there for the sole purpose of marking the precedence and type-of-service of each packet. It has been well known since the 1970's that certain classes of traffic -- particularly voice (and yes, there was voice on the internet even during the 1970's) -- need special handling... <a href="https://circleid.com/postsquestioning_net_neutrality">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-17T11:55:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Europe is to the US Controlled GPS as Europe is to the US Controlled DNS Root? (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsgps_as_europe_is_to_us_controlled_dns_root</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsgps_as_europe_is_to_us_controlled_dns_root</link>
		<description><![CDATA[An Analogy: Europe is to the US controlled GPS as Europe is to the US controlled DNS root? That's not a very good title is it? But it does express the point I want to make. This week the European Union launched the first satellite of its own global positioning system, Galileo. One has to wonder why the Europeans feel they need to do this. Isn't the GPS system run by the United States a perfectly good system? <a href="https://circleid.com/postsgps_as_europe_is_to_us_controlled_dns_root">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-17T11:55:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> ICANN Does Something Technical! (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsicann_does_something_technical</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsicann_does_something_technical</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I've often said that ICANN regulates the business of buying and selling of domain names and that ICANN's claim that it coordinates technical matters to preserve the stability of DNS is a fantasy. Well I am proven wrong. ICANN has done something technical. ICANN has issued <a href="http://www.icann.org/general/idn-guidelines-07nov05.pdf">Guidelines for the Implementation of Internationalized Domain Names, Draft Version 2</a> [PDF] (pending approval by the ICANN board.) It's only four pages long, but those few pages contain a lot of significant material. <a href="https://circleid.com/postsicann_does_something_technical">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-17T11:55:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Forgotten Principles of Internet Governance (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsforgotten_principles_of_internet_governance</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsforgotten_principles_of_internet_governance</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Suddenly internet governance has become a hot topic. Words and phrases fly back and forth but minds rarely meet. We do not have discussion, we have chaos. We are not moving forwards towards a resolution. It's time to step back and review some basic principles. 1. Principle: The internet is here to serve the needs of people (and organizations of people); people are not here to serve the internet. Corollary: If internet technology does not meet the needs of users and organizations than it is technology that should be the first to flex and change. <a href="https://circleid.com/postsforgotten_principles_of_internet_governance">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-17T11:55:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> About Those Root Servers (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsabout_those_root_servers</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsabout_those_root_servers</link>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an interesting note on the ITU Strategy and Policy Unit Newslog about [url=http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/newslog/Root+Servers+Anycast+DNSSEC+WGIG+And+WSIS.aspx]Root Servers, Anycast, DNSSEC, WGIG and WSIS[/url] about a presentation to ICANN's GAC. (The GAC website appears to be offline or inaccessible today.) The interesting sentence is this: Lack of formal relationship with root server operators is a public policy issue relevant to Internet governance. It is stated that this is "wrong" and "not a way to solve the issues about who edits the [root] zone file." Let's look at that lack of a formal relationship... <a href="https://circleid.com/postsabout_those_root_servers">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-17T11:55:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>