<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-03-31T21:29:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> Stopping SOPA's Anti-Circumvention (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20111215_stopping_sopas_anti_circumvention</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20111215_stopping_sopas_anti_circumvention</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The House's Stop Online Piracy Act is in Judiciary Committee Markup today. As numerous protests, open letters, and advocacy campaigns across the Web, this is a seriously flawed bill. Sen. Ron Wyden and Rep. Darrell Issa's proposed OPEN Act points out, by contrast, some of the procedural problems. Here, I analyze just one of the problematic provisions of SOPA: a new"anticircumvention" provision <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20111215_stopping_sopas_anti_circumvention">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> ICANN: The Stakes in Registrar Accreditation (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsicann_the_stakes_in_registrar_accreditation</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsicann_the_stakes_in_registrar_accreditation</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Law enforcement demands to domain name registrars were a recurring theme of the 42d ICANN public meeting, concluded last week in Dakar. The Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) took every opportunity at its public meetings with GNSO and Board, and in its Communique to express dismay, disappointment, and demands for urgent action to "reduce the risk of criminal abuse of the domain name system." <a href="https://circleid.com/postsicann_the_stakes_in_registrar_accreditation">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Deceptive Assurances of Privacy? (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20110610_deceptive_assurances_of_privacy</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20110610_deceptive_assurances_of_privacy</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, Facebook expanded the roll-out of its facial recognition software to tag people in photos uploaded to the social networking site. Many observers and regulators responded with privacy concerns; EFF offered a video showing users how to opt-out. Tim O'Reilly, however, takes a different tack... O'Reilly's point - and face-recognition technology - is bigger than Facebook. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20110610_deceptive_assurances_of_privacy">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Editorials Against PROTECT-IP (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postseditorials_against_protect_ip</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postseditorials_against_protect_ip</link>
		<description><![CDATA[First the Los Angeles Times, now the New York Times have both printed editorials critical of the PROTECT-IP bill. Both the LAT and NYT support copyright - and announce as much in their opening sentences. That doesn't mean we should sacrifice Internet security and stability for legitimate DNS users, nor the transparency of the rule of law. <a href="https://circleid.com/postseditorials_against_protect_ip">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Debugging Legislation: PROTECT IP (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20110512_debugging_legislation_protect_ip</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20110512_debugging_legislation_protect_ip</link>
		<description><![CDATA[There's more than a hint of theatrics in the draft PROTECT IP bill that has emerged as son-of-COICA, starting with the ungainly acronym of a name. Given its roots in the entertainment industry, that low drama comes as no surprise. Each section name is worse than the last: "Eliminating the Financial Incentive to Steal Intellectual Property Online" (Sec. 4) gives way to "Voluntary action for Taking Action Against Websites Stealing American Intellectual Property". <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20110512_debugging_legislation_protect_ip">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> In DHS Takedown Frenzy, Mozilla Refuses to Delete MafiaaFire Add-On (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20110506_dhs_takedown_frenzy_mozilla_refuses_to_delete_mafiaafire_add_on</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20110506_dhs_takedown_frenzy_mozilla_refuses_to_delete_mafiaafire_add_on</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Not satisfied with seizing domain names, the Department of Homeland Security asked Mozilla to take down the MafiaaFire add-on for Firefox. Mozilla, through its legal counsel Harvey Anderson, refused. Mozilla deserves thanks and credit for a principled stand for its users' rights. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20110506_dhs_takedown_frenzy_mozilla_refuses_to_delete_mafiaafire_add_on">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Super Bust: Due Process and Domain Name Seizure (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20110203_super_bust_due_process_and_domain_name_seizure</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20110203_super_bust_due_process_and_domain_name_seizure</link>
		<description><![CDATA[With the same made-for PR timing that prompted a previous seizure of domain names just before shopping's "Cyber Monday," Immigration and Customs Enforcement struck again, this time days before the Super Bowl, against "10 websites that illegally streamed live sporting telecasts and pay-per-view events over the Internet." ICE executed seizure warrants against the 10 by demanding that registries redirect nameserver requests for the domains to 74.81.170.110, where a colorful "This domain name has been seized by ICE" graphic is displayed. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20110203_super_bust_due_process_and_domain_name_seizure">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Personalized Search Opacity (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20091208_personalized_search_opacity</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20091208_personalized_search_opacity</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Google announced Friday that it would now be "personalizing" all searches, not just those for signed-in users. If your browser has a Google cookie, unless you've explicitly opted out, your search results will be customized based on search history. Danny Sullivan, at Search Engine Land, wonders why more people aren't paying attention. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20091208_personalized_search_opacity">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> The Freedom to Innovate Without Permission (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20090921_the_freedom_to_innovate_without_permission</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20090921_the_freedom_to_innovate_without_permission</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://openinternet.gov/read-speech.html">In a speech this morning</a>, widely heralded (and <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/09/21/net-neutrality-speech-draws-strong-reactions/">criticized</a>) as a call for "network neutrality," FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski: "Why has the Internet proved to be such a powerful engine for creativity, innovation, and economic growth? A big part of the answer traces back to one key decision by the Internet's original architects: to make the Internet an open system." Now "open system" doesn't mean anarchy. The Internet has rules, technical standards codified in the unassuming sounding "Requests for Comment." <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20090921_the_freedom_to_innovate_without_permission">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Susan Crawford to the White House on Ada Lovelace Day (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20090324_susan_crawford_white_house_ada_lovelace_day</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20090324_susan_crawford_white_house_ada_lovelace_day</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Just in time for <a href="http://findingada.com/">Ada Lovelace</a> <a href="http://www.pledgebank.com/AdaLovelaceDay">Day</a> comes the <a href="http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/03/onewebday-founder-tapped-by-ob.php">news</a> that <a href="http://scrawford.net/">Susan Crawford</a> (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Crawford_(professor)" title="Susan Crawford (professor) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia">Wikipedia</a>, <a href="http://www.circleid.com/members/738/" title="Susan Crawford on CircleID">CircleID</a>) is headed to the White House as special assistant to the president for science, technology, and innovation policy... <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20090324_susan_crawford_white_house_ada_lovelace_day">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> ICANN's New gTLD Process: Hype and Reality (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsicann_new_tld_hype</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsicann_new_tld_hype</link>
		<description><![CDATA[At its 32d International <del>Junket</del> Meeting last week, <a href="http://www.icann.org/">ICANN</a>'s Board <a href="https://par.icann.org/files/paris/ParisBoardMeeting_26June08.txt">approved</a> the <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/issues/new-gtlds/pdp-dec05-fr-parta-08aug07.htm">GNSO Council's recommendations</a> for the eventual addition to the root of new generic top-level domains (gTLDs). This means that eventually, when the staff drafts, community comments upon, and Board approves implementation processes, those with deep pockets will have the opportunity to bid for new TLD strings... <a href="https://circleid.com/postsicann_new_tld_hype">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> The FCC Stumbles Into Internet Filtering (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts86257_fcc_internet_filtering</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts86257_fcc_internet_filtering</link>
		<description><![CDATA[What could be bad about free wireless Internet access? How about censorship by federally mandated filters that make it no longer "Internet." That's the effect of the FCC's proposed service rules for Advanced Wireless Service spectrum in the 2155-2180 MHz band, as set out in a July 20 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Acting on a request of M2Z Networks, which wants to provide "free, family-friendly wireless broadband," the FCC proposes to require licensees of this spectrum band to offer free two-way wireless broadband Internet service to the public, with least 25% of their network capacity. So far so good, but on the next page, the agency guts the meaning of "broadband Internet" with a content filtering requirement. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts86257_fcc_internet_filtering">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> WHOIS Redux: Demand Privacy in Domain Name Registration (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts710254_whois_privacy_domain_name_registration</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts710254_whois_privacy_domain_name_registration</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1002555">Doc's post</a> and the impending comments deadline for the next iteration of ICANN's never-ending WHOIS saga finally pushed me to write up my thoughts on the latest iteration of ICANN debate. As Doc points out, much of the current debate is very inside baseball, tied up in acronyms atop bureaucratic layers. Small wonder then that ordinary domain name registrants and Internet users haven't commented much, while the fora are dominated by INTA members turning out responses to an "urgent request" to "let ICANN know that Whois is important to the brand owners I represent"... <a href="https://circleid.com/posts710254_whois_privacy_domain_name_registration">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Lawyer-Impersonator Pleads Guilty over False C&Ds (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts79713_lawyer_domain_registrant_guilty</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts79713_lawyer_domain_registrant_guilty</link>
		<description><![CDATA[As if there weren't enough problems with <em>lawyers</em> sending out improper <a href="http://www.chillingeffects.org/">cease-and-desists</a>, Wired News <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/09/fraudster-who-i.html">reports</a> that a Nevada man has pleaded guilty to <em>impersonating</em> a lawyer to extort domain registrants to turn over their domain names. "A Nevada man pleaded guilty Thursday to his plotting to steal domain names from their legitimate owners by impersonating a California intellectual property lawyer and send threatening letters to domain name owners in hopes of convincing them to turn over the domains to him..." <a href="https://circleid.com/posts79713_lawyer_domain_registrant_guilty">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Aging the Internet Prematurely, One PDP at a Time (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsnew_domain_names_internet</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsnew_domain_names_internet</link>
		<description><![CDATA[After <a href="http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/06/25/icann_keep_the_core_neutral_stupid.html">blogging about</a> ICANN's <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/pdp-dec05-fr-a-18jun07.pdf">new gTLD policy</a> or lack thereof [also <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_keep_core_neutral_stupid/">featured on CircleID</a>], I've had several people ask me why I care so much about <a href="http://www.icann.org/">ICANN</a> and new top-level domains. Domain names barely matter in a world of search and hyperlinks, I'm told, and new domains would amount to little more than a cash transfer to new registries from those trying to protect their names and brands. While I agree that type-in site-location is less and less relevant, and we haven't yet seen much end-user focused innovation in the use of domain names, I'm not ready to throw in the towel. I think ICANN is still in a position to do affirmative harm to Internet innovation. <a href="https://circleid.com/postsnew_domain_names_internet">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>