<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-03-31T21:29:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> Blissful Ignorance: Placement Prostituting the Press (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsblissful_ignorance_placement_prostituting_the_press</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsblissful_ignorance_placement_prostituting_the_press</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew McLaughlin, in his [url=http://www.circleid.com/article/369_0_1_0_C/]excellent dismemberment of the BBC's report[/url] on the "IPv4 address crisis", is observing not a random piece of sloppy research, but the success of settled policy. That policy, pursued by public relations companies serving information technology and telecommunications (IT&T) companies, is simple to sum up: "identify, support and encourage technically ignorant journalism". It centres around the most valuable word in the lexicon of the public relations firm: "placement"...A key characteristic of the "placement" story is its conformance to a template...With one search, I found a CNET story published in July with quite startling parallels to the BBC story... <a href="https://circleid.com/postsblissful_ignorance_placement_prostituting_the_press">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Juniper's IPv6 Advocate Tests Mythology (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsjunipers_ipv6_advocate_tests_mythology</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsjunipers_ipv6_advocate_tests_mythology</link>
		<description><![CDATA[IPv6 advocacy has been tainted by FUD and half-truth. CommsWorld recently interviewed [url=https://www.juniper.net]Juniper[/url]'s Jeff Doyle, who is a strong supporter of IPv6 -- but who also has little patience for IPv6 mythology. Forget security, half-true address crises and QoS: the best reason for the world to run with IPv6 is what's driven the Internet all along -- [url=http://www1.commsworld.com.au/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=commsworld/home&var_el=art&art_id=1034683451310&var_sect=NEWS&from=home]innovation[/url]. <a href="https://circleid.com/postsjunipers_ipv6_advocate_tests_mythology">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>