<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-04-08T19:45:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> Different Focus on Spam Needed (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20130425_different_focus_on_spam_needed</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20130425_different_focus_on_spam_needed</link>
		<description><![CDATA[It is surprisingly difficult to get accurate figures for the amount of spam that is sent globally, yet everyone agrees that the global volume of spam has come down a lot since its peak in late 2008. At the same time, despite some recent small decreases, the catch rates of spam filters remain generally high... A world in which email can be used without spam filters is a distant utopia. Yet, the decline of spam volumes and the continuing success (recent glitches aside) of filters have two important consequences. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20130425_different_focus_on_spam_needed">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-08T12:45:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>