<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-04-06T20:04:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> The Human Factor in DDoS Attacks (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20110925_the_human_factor_in_ddos_attacks</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20110925_the_human_factor_in_ddos_attacks</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Ripped from the headlines: A recent DDoS attack lasted an entire 60 days. In other news, a single site was attacked 218 times in Q2 alone. To those of us in the business of protecting Web infrastructure, these stories are hardly surprising. What's notable, though, is where they were reported, in The Financial, whose focus is banking and financial services, not technology. The reporters used the term "DDoS" as if it were as common as "hedge fund," something everyday business people, not just techies, grasp. It's this human element that caught my interest and got me thinking a little. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20110925_the_human_factor_in_ddos_attacks">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-06T13:04:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>