<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-04-30T19:14:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> AI in Academia: Tool or Trap? Balancing Innovation and Intellectual Honesty in the Digital Age (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsai-in-academia-tool-or-trap-balancing-innovation-and-intellectual-honesty-in-the-digital-age</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsai-in-academia-tool-or-trap-balancing-innovation-and-intellectual-honesty-in-the-digital-age</link>
		<description><![CDATA[AI has revolutionized how we process information, optimize tasks, and conduct research. However, its integration into academia sparks ethical and practical debates. Should we limit its use? How can we assess a student's true knowledge if they employ these tools? This text explores these questions from the perspective of a technology expert who argues that banning AI is as absurd as rejecting calculators or spreadsheets in the past. <a href="https://circleid.com/postsai-in-academia-tool-or-trap-balancing-innovation-and-intellectual-honesty-in-the-digital-age">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-30T12:14:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> The Rotten Roots - Summary of Issues and Sources on Net Neutrality (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20150518_rotten_roots_summary_of_issues_and_sources_on_net_neutrality</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20150518_rotten_roots_summary_of_issues_and_sources_on_net_neutrality</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The timeline of the Net Neutrality issue has been detailed here. And quoting from Vox: 'Wheeler said that peering is "an issue that we are investigating, it's an issue we are very interested in, but it's not the issue here today."' <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20150518_rotten_roots_summary_of_issues_and_sources_on_net_neutrality">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-30T12:14:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Is Today the Beginning of the End of Net Neutrality? (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20140515_is_today_the_beginning_of_the_end_of_net_neutrality</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20140515_is_today_the_beginning_of_the_end_of_net_neutrality</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, May 15, 2014 a vote will be taken at the FCC. Today the Internet we know can change forever. Today at 10:30 am EST the FCC meets to vote on the issue on whether or not allow the collection of special rates to provide certain services through the Internet for those who can afford it. A "faster lane" has been called... Who will pay for the use of this improved infrastructure? <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20140515_is_today_the_beginning_of_the_end_of_net_neutrality">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-30T12:14:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> 2050: The Internet Odyssey - How We Lost It and a Way to Get It Back (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20140508_2050_the_internet_odyssey_how_we_lost_it_and_a_way_to_get_it_back</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20140508_2050_the_internet_odyssey_how_we_lost_it_and_a_way_to_get_it_back</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet was replaced by a dual system created in 2014: a fiber optic network called "Net2Cash". It has a speed of one hundred Petabits per second (equivalent to 100 million Gigabits per second or 100,000 million Megabits per second). We no longer talk about Megabytes or Gigabytes because that is old school. Nowadays a couple of Exabites store the content of all written by man, from books and newspapers to Sumerian clay tablets; from Inca quipus and Egyptian hieroglyphs to all homework made by kids registered in elementary school. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20140508_2050_the_internet_odyssey_how_we_lost_it_and_a_way_to_get_it_back">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-30T12:14:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Stop the Presses! No Consensus at NetMundial! (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20140425_stop_the_presses_no_consensus_at_netmundial</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20140425_stop_the_presses_no_consensus_at_netmundial</link>
		<description><![CDATA[We could see it as a victory for those advocating changes and adjustments in the system of internet governance. Au contraire... we could consider it as the debacle of the good intentions... all ending up in not knowing if it was worth it. I say and maintain, that the effort and the earned contributions were worth it. The final result is that ICANN should be strengthened to recognize its merits and achievements, not underestimate what this organization has accomplished in fifteen years of hard and continuous work. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20140425_stop_the_presses_no_consensus_at_netmundial">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-30T12:14:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>