<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-03-31T21:29:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> A Collision Between Tech Policy and Foreign Policy: the UN Cybercrime Convention (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsa-collision-between-tech-policy-and-foreign-policy-the-un-cybercrime-convention</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsa-collision-between-tech-policy-and-foreign-policy-the-un-cybercrime-convention</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometime by year-end, the UN General Assembly (UNGA) will vote on the proposed UN Convention Against Cybercrime. The treaty is opposed by most civil liberties organizations and Internet businesses, although the US position appears uncertain, mostly for reasons of foreign policy. <a href="https://circleid.com/postsa-collision-between-tech-policy-and-foreign-policy-the-un-cybercrime-convention">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Facebook's "Supreme Court" Has Implications for International Law (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20210423-facebooks-supreme-court-has-implications-for-international-law</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20210423-facebooks-supreme-court-has-implications-for-international-law</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, Facebook created its widely dubbed "Supreme Court" (officially the Oversight Board) in an effort to outsource some of the platform's most difficult content decisions. By all accounts, Facebook hoped the Board would have global legitimacy to make the toughest content decisions and help avoid reputational damage for being biased, arbitrary, tone-deaf, or worse. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20210423-facebooks-supreme-court-has-implications-for-international-law">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>