<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-04-08T19:45:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> Registration And Use Of Domain Name Infringing Another's Trademark Ruled "Advertising Injury" Covere (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/postsregistration_and_use_of_domain_name_infringing_anothers_trademark_ruled_adv</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/postsregistration_and_use_of_domain_name_infringing_anothers_trademark_ruled_adv</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The registration and use of an Internet domain name that allegedly infringes another's trademark is an "advertising injury" within the meaning of an insurance policy, and thus requires the accused company's insurer to provide coverage, according to a recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. In the same ruling, the Fourth Circuit also held that the domain name, because it led customers to advertisements at the related website, constituted use of the trademark "in the course of advertising." State Auto Property and Cas. Ins. Co. v. Travelers Indemn. Co. of Am. <a href="https://circleid.com/postsregistration_and_use_of_domain_name_infringing_anothers_trademark_ruled_adv">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-08T12:45:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>