<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-04-08T19:45:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> Reflections on EUI's New Community Priority Evaluation Guidelines for New gTLDs (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20130912_reflections_on_euis_new_cpe_guidelines</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20130912_reflections_on_euis_new_cpe_guidelines</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) guidelines prepared by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), and published by ICANN are now past their feedback period. We, at Radix, believe that ICANN has received feedback from approximately 10 stakeholders, and I for one, am looking forward to those being published. In light of the fact that none of the comments that ICANN received have been made public yet, I decided to blog about my multiple concerns with the new guidelines. Sparing a thought for the not-so-involved reader, I have limited my rant to some of the more important issues. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20130912_reflections_on_euis_new_cpe_guidelines">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-08T12:45:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Name Collision: Why ICANN Is Looking at It the Wrong Way (Part 1) (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20130903_name_collision_why_icann_is_looking_at_it_the_wrong_way_part_1</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20130903_name_collision_why_icann_is_looking_at_it_the_wrong_way_part_1</link>
		<description><![CDATA[ICANN has, once again opened up a veritable can of worms, with their latest decision on the 'horrors' of Name Collision. While we are sure that ICANN and the Interisle Consulting Group have very good reason to make the decision that they have - delaying the delegation of several TLDs - we believe that the findings contained in Interisle's report do not give sufficient cause to delay the new gTLD program in the manner proposed by ICANN staff. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20130903_name_collision_why_icann_is_looking_at_it_the_wrong_way_part_1">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-08T12:45:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>