<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-04-30T19:14:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> 3 Strategies for Keeping ICANN and IANA On-Mission and Out of Politics (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20150910_3_strategies_for_keeping_icann_iana_on_mission_and_out_of_politics</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20150910_3_strategies_for_keeping_icann_iana_on_mission_and_out_of_politics</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last year, the ICANN community has been raging on about two issues: the looming IANA transition away from the US government, and how to ensure the organization is accountable to all the Internet's stakeholders. While the issues have run on separate tracks, they both boil down to one question: can ICANN be trusted to be a good steward of the Internet's future? The answer to this question will go a long way in deciding ICANN's future. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20150910_3_strategies_for_keeping_icann_iana_on_mission_and_out_of_politics">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-30T12:14:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>