<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-04-07T16:34:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> Top Five Recommendations for IoT Policymakers from ITAC Industry Participants (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20160503_top_five_recommendations_for_iot_policymakers_from_itac_industry</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20160503_top_five_recommendations_for_iot_policymakers_from_itac_industry</link>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Department of Commerce considers a policy role for the U.S. government in the Internet of Things (IoT), the Department of State is studying a dynamic and evolving international environment around IoT, including technical, commercial, and economic issues. Governments and intergovernmental organizations across the world are waking up to the potential of IoT, and some are looking to move quickly in a nascent landscape to establish themselves as leaders for IoT globally. In the process, few are reaching out to industry. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20160503_top_five_recommendations_for_iot_policymakers_from_itac_industry">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-07T09:34:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>