<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-03-31T21:29:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> IGF2019 Observation: Compare Chancellor Merkel's Digital Sovereignty with Chinese and U.S. Version (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20191201_igf2019_chancellor_merkels_digital_sovereignty_vs_china_us</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20191201_igf2019_chancellor_merkels_digital_sovereignty_vs_china_us</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2019 UN IGF is right now being held in Berlin and entering the last day. There has been a wide range of exciting discussions. It is a huge step forward that this year's IGF has been able to bring a plethora of topics together under a framework of thinking after the efforts done by the UN Secretary-General António Guterres' High-Level Panel on Digital Cooperation (The Age of Digital Interdependence) and by German scholars' engagement with all the stakeholders... <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20191201_igf2019_chancellor_merkels_digital_sovereignty_vs_china_us">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> WannaCry: Patching Dilemma from the Other Side (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20170516_wannacry_patching_dilemma_from_the_other_side</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20170516_wannacry_patching_dilemma_from_the_other_side</link>
		<description><![CDATA[WannaCry, originated firstly in state projects but spread by other actors, has touched upon myriads of infrastructure such as hospitals, telecommunication, railroads that many countries have labelled as critical. IT engineers are hastily presenting patching codes in various localized versions. The other patch needed, however, is more than technical. It is normative and legislative. The coding of that patch for a situation like this is in two layers of dilemma. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20170516_wannacry_patching_dilemma_from_the_other_side">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> While Cyberspace Is Entering an Era of Warring States, There Remains a Chance to Make a Difference (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20170413_cyberspace_era_of_warring_states_chance_to_make_a_difference</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20170413_cyberspace_era_of_warring_states_chance_to_make_a_difference</link>
		<description><![CDATA[For the non-state actors who are making efforts to approach cybersecurity issue in a different and creative way, the state actors, however, have given clear signs that they have exhausted their patience and insisted on doing things alone by bringing traditional old tricks back into cyberspace. This is exemplified in the bilateral meeting of two cyber sovereigntists - the Chinese and U.S. presidents on April 6-7, and in the multilateral G7 Declaration on Responsible States Behavior in Cyberspace on April 11. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20170413_cyberspace_era_of_warring_states_chance_to_make_a_difference">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Three Layers of China's International Strategy on Cyberspace (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20170307_three_layers_of_chinas_international_strategy_on_cyberspace</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20170307_three_layers_of_chinas_international_strategy_on_cyberspace</link>
		<description><![CDATA[China's newly released <em>International Strategy on Cyberspace</em> is marked by three distinctive layers with different degree of priority: (1) sovereignty (or cybersecurity, or UN Charter), (2) globalization (or digital economy, or WTO rules), and (3) fundamental freedoms (or human rights, or UDHR). The good point of the strategy is that it tries to make the three layers peacefully co-exist in one document. The failure, however, lies in the intentional ranking of relevance/importance of the three layers... <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20170307_three_layers_of_chinas_international_strategy_on_cyberspace">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> From ICANN57 Hyderabad to the 3rd WIC Wuzhen Summit: A Moment of Consensus on Internet Governance (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20161206_from_icann57_hyderabad_to_the_3rd_wic_wuzhen_summit</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20161206_from_icann57_hyderabad_to_the_3rd_wic_wuzhen_summit</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Two events that happened last month deserve an additional note. One is the ICANN57 conference held in Hyderabad on November 3-9. The other is the 3rd World Internet Conference Wuzhen Summit held in Zhejiang Province on November 16-18. Though being completely overwhelmed by the result of President election in the United States, both events mark the victory of non-state actors and serve as good news for the community. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20161206_from_icann57_hyderabad_to_the_3rd_wic_wuzhen_summit">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-03-31T14:29:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>