<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-04-08T16:28:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> Internet Governance for Sustainability (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20170619_internet_governance_for_sustainability</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20170619_internet_governance_for_sustainability</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Sustainability is a difficult term to avoid these days. With that in mind, it's somewhat surprising that last week's European Dialogue on Internet Governance (EuroDIG), now in its tenth year, featured one of its first workshops looking at the subject. But while the workshop focused on issues of energy usage and e-waste, the concept of sustainability raises some much broader and likely difficult questions for the Internet governance community. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20170619_internet_governance_for_sustainability">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-08T09:28:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>