<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>&#45; CircleID</title>
	<link>https://www.circleid.com/blogs/</link>
	<description>Postings from  on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2026, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2026-04-30T19:14:00+00:00</dc:date>

	
	<item>
		<title> The .ORG Debate Should be About What Its Users Want (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://circleid.com/posts20200108_the_dot_org_debate_should_be_about_what_its_users_want</guid>
		<link>https://circleid.com/posts20200108_the_dot_org_debate_should_be_about_what_its_users_want</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I watch the controversy over the proposed sale of the .ORG domain with a mixture of bemusement and concern. Some in the ICANN community &ndash; mostly those who resent that the Internet ever became commercialized &ndash; oppose the sale of the Public Interest Registry to the for-profit company Ethos for $1.1 billion. The basis of their concern is that the domain for non-profits should be in the hands of a non-profit and that the new owners might increase the current $9.93 fee PIR charges for a domain. <a href="https://circleid.com/posts20200108_the_dot_org_debate_should_be_about_what_its_users_want">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2026-04-30T12:14:00-07:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>