Home / News

Thousands of Languages Remain Underrepresented Online, CODI Finds

CODI findings show Internet connectivity alone cannot overcome persistent language barriers to meaningful digital participation.

The Coalition on Digital Impact (CODI) has published its first State of Digital Access report, finding that Internet connectivity alone does not translate into meaningful digital participation when users cannot navigate services, find content or complete transactions in their own languages.

The report, Global Web: The State of Digital Access, 2026, examines what CODI describes as a mismatch between demand from underserved language communities and the programs, policies and technologies intended to expand digital participation. More than 7,000 languages are spoken worldwide, while approximately 10 account for most online content, according to the report.

More than half of surveyed organizations reported a native-language access problem. CODI surveyed organizations working directly with underserved language communities between December 2025 and February 2026, with respondents operating across Africa, Asia, Australia, North America and Europe.

The accompanying survey summary says 76.5% reported that their communities had Internet access, but roughly 53% said users could not navigate the Internet in their native language. Respondents identified missing local-language content, poor translation, rejection of internationalized email addresses, missing keyboards and scripts, and weak local-language search and discovery among recurring barriers.

The report says local-language material, where available, is often concentrated in news and social media, while educational, commercial, professional and government services remain predominantly available in dominant languages. It also documents problems including limited search indexing, poor support for non-Latin scripts and online forms that reject Internationalized Domain Name email addresses.

Universal Acceptance addresses only part of the problem. CODI describes Universal Acceptance—ensuring that domain names, internationalized email addresses and scripts are correctly accepted and processed across Internet-enabled systems—as an essential technical foundation for multilingual participation. But the report argues that users also require searchable content, usable services, appropriate input tools and trustworthy information in their languages.

The supply side presents a different problem. CODI reviewed digital-development programs and policies from governments, multilateral bodies and technology organizations and found substantial investment in infrastructure, digital skills, governance and innovation. It says linguistic inclusion, however, is rarely treated as a foundational design requirement; language support is more commonly introduced through translation or localization after systems have been developed.

AI could amplify the existing imbalance. The report notes investments in low-resource and multilingual language models, including Meta’s No Language Left Behind work and initiatives from Google, but says most AI language projects still cover only a subset of the world’s languages. Commercial investment also tends to follow market size, leaving many underrepresented languages outside the strongest areas of development.

CODI also identifies a coordination gap: community organizations seeking localized content, multilingual technology, funding and policy support often operate separately from the governments, funders and technology providers investing in digital development. The organization plans to build on the baseline with research partnerships, crowdsourced contributions and a searchable catalog of digital-access resources.

By CircleID Reporter —

CircleID’s internal staff reporting on news tips and developing stories. Do you have information the professional Internet community should be aware of? Contact us.

Visit Page

Filed Under

Comments

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

Related

Topics

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

DNS

Sponsored byDNIB.com

DNS Security

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC