Gerald M. Levine on CircleID

Gerald M. Levine

Intellectual Property, Arbitrator/Mediator at Levine Samuel LLP
Joined on March 9, 2016
Total Post Views: 1,614,417


	About


	Send Message


	RSS

Gerald M. Levine is an attorney practicing in New York City. He is the managing partner of Levine Samuel, LLP, a boutique law firm concentrating on trademark and domain name law. Details about his background and the firm can be found on the Firm's website at iplegalcorner.com. Mr. Levine has a litigation and counseling practice representing clients in Intellectual Property rights and rights management as well as a diverse range of legal and business matters in the fields of publishing and copyright (representing authors) and trademark and brand counseling as it relates to the intersection of trademarks and domain names. He is on the panel of neutral arbitrators for the American Arbitration Association for commercial and IP disputes; for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). For disputes under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, he is a Panelist on the Forum Roster of Neutrals, the Czech Arbitration Court (CAC), and the Canadian International Internet Dispute Resolution Centre (CIIDRC) He is the author of a treatise on Trademarks, Domain Names, and Cybersquatting, Domain Name Arbitration: A Practical Guide to Asserting and Defending Claims of Cybersquatting. A forthcoming book of essays, Clash of Trademarks and Domain Names on the Internet is scheduled for publication Spring 2022. A Second Edition of the treatise was published September 2019 and is available from Amazon or from the publisher, Legal Corner Press (LCP). For inquiries to LCP write to [email protected] or Mr. Levine at [email protected] or by telephone at 917.325.2852.

Except where otherwise noted, all postings by Gerald M. Levine on CircleID are licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Comments

2018 - Nov 16	on	Verisign's Attempt to Increase its Fees Still Unjustified Despite Diversionary Tactic
2018 - Nov 01	on	Good Faith and Abusive Registration of Domain Names
2018 - Sep 27	on	Undone! Failure of Persuasion in UDRP Proceedings
2018 - Sep 26	on	Undone! Failure of Persuasion in UDRP Proceedings
2018 - Sep 26	on	Undone! Failure of Persuasion in UDRP Proceedings
2018 - Jan 15	on	In Memoriam: UDRPsearch.com
2017 - Dec 14	on	Why UDRP Panelists Must Follow the Policy: A Look at the Devex.org Decision
2017 - Dec 05	on	Artful Misrepresentations of UDRP Jurisprudence
2017 - Nov 19	on	UDRPs Filed - Brand Owners Take Note
2017 - Nov 02	on	Reverse Domain Hijacking Where Complainant Knew but Did Not Disclose Geographic Significance of Mark
2017 - Oct 11	on	Trademark Rights Paramount to Contract Rights for Domain Names
2017 - Jul 14	on	After 21 Years, Actor David Duchovny Wins His Domain Name
2017 - Jun 15	on	Why the Record Number of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking UDRP Filings in 2016?
2017 - May 09	on	Commodifying Words and Letters in the .Com Space
2017 - Apr 03	on	Passive Holding of Domain Names and the Argument for Bad Faith or Forfeiture
2017 - Jan 06	on	Using Domain Name Privacy/Proxy Services Lawfully or to Hide Contact Information and Identity
2016 - Dec 30	on	Using Domain Name Privacy/Proxy Services Lawfully or to Hide Contact Information and Identity
2016 - Dec 30	on	Using Domain Name Privacy/Proxy Services Lawfully or to Hide Contact Information and Identity
2016 - Dec 04	on	Excessive Offers to Sell Domain Names: Evidence of Bad Faith or Bona Fide Business Practice?
2016 - Oct 14	on	When 'Confusing Similarity' in UDRP Cases Gets Confusing
2016 - Aug 02	on	TMCH Review Recommends Status Quo
2016 - Apr 26	on	Even Lawyers Have Domain Name Problems
2016 - Apr 05	on	Transfers of Domain Names Contemporaneous with Complaint: Cyberflight?

Topic Interests

Law , Domain Names , UDRP , Domain Management , Policy & Regulation , New TLDs , Brand Protection , Privacy , Registry Services , Cybercrime , ICANN , Internet Governance ,

Recent Blogs

Searching for the Meaning of “Registers” in the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA)

Nov 04, 2021
Comments: 0
Views: 16,153

What Due Diligence Satisfies Domain Name Registrant’s Representations (UDRP)?

Sep 30, 2021
Comments: 0
Views: 16,233

Gerald M. Levine

Comments

Topic Interests

Recent Blogs

Searching for the Meaning of “Registers” in the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA)

What Due Diligence Satisfies Domain Name Registrant’s Representations (UDRP)?

Offering Price as Evidence of Bad Faith Domain Name Registration: A False (UDRP) Factor

Time of Registration in Determining Cybersquatting

Limitations and Laches as Defenses in Domain Name Cybersquatting Claims

Popular Posts

Offering Price as Evidence of Bad Faith Domain Name Registration: A False (UDRP) Factor

Abusive and Malicious Registrations of Domain Names

Time of Registration in Determining Cybersquatting

Exploring the Meanings of “Right” and “Legitimate Interest” (UDRP Proceedings)

Fair Use Incorporating Trademarks in Domain Names