Home / Blogs

Technology: Doomsday or Godsend – the Choice Is Ours

Following the American insurrection and the role the media played—social media, particularly the “doomsday scenario,” started to appear again in relation to technological developments. Only a few years ago, a group of hi-tech companies, including Tesla, warned against the negative aspects of artificial intelligence (AI).

Other technologies that could seriously affect human developments include gene editing, nanotechnology and synthetic biology.

Technological doomsday scenarios are possible. A decade ago, I would have said that we as humanity would prevent those doom scenarios from happening and that we have heard of doomsday scenarios before but that we, with combined effort, had been able to manage them (for example, the nuclear threat).

The nuclear issue is a good example as we, as a global community (despite being at that time involved in a cold war), could prevent a doom scenario from happening.

The reason why I am more cautious now is that we are dismantling our global collaboration structures. China and Russia are not the sort of societies most of us subscribe to, but we have no other choice than to be in dialogue with them, and the current policies are more based on demonizing, and that makes any form of collaboration nearly impossible.

Brexit is another example of stupidity, and America withdrawing—under its previous administration—from and/or undermining international institutions is another serious setback. While some of this will be reversed, some serious damage has already been done.

All the current technological development issues are of a global nature; none can be “solved” by single nation policies or actions.

The current crisis around social media shows what happens. These companies can, in a commercial sense, only thrive in a global market. They have now become so big that they threaten, in this case, social cohesion and democracy. We as humanity have failed to build a structure around it to prevent the misuse as we have been witnessing in America.

The fact that Chinese digital mogul Jack Ma, from Alibaba, was silenced for months shows that China understands this threat. His company was getting so big that it started to threaten China’s Communist Party (CCP). Like it or not, the Chinese Government decided not to let that happen, surely also warned by the examples they saw in the USA.

If we in the Western democracies want to maintain our way of life, we can only do so by first getting together and secondly starting the dialogue with others, namely China and Russia, but obviously also Africa and so forth.

There is a lot of focus on the contribution social media has made to the current political crisis in America.

Is it too late for that? Have we created too much damage to our global structures of cooperation? Even if under U.S. President Joe Biden, we can start the healing process, will we be strong enough to take serious action to prevent technology from being used for the detriment of humanity?

What has become clear is that we cannot just wait and see what happens and then try to rectify it afterward. Instead, we do need policies and regulations to ensure that we as humanity stay in control of those developments from the start. Europe is looking at preventative regulations as we discussed here.

I always remain optimistic, but I also want to be a realist. Of course, we can manage our technologies in a way that they assist humanity and not damage us. The question is, do we have the right leadership, political will, and the right economic, social and political structures in place to do so? Are we willing to look at structural changes as I discussed here, or are we muddling on and moving closer to the precipice and waiting for another crisis? Or will one of those future doomsday scenarios be a real existential one?

I would argue that we do need technologies to face off the many challenges that we are facing. They are just tools, and humans are toolmakers, and we have always used them to advance humanity. So, we can and should use technologies to assist us in overcoming doomsday scenarios. The choice is ours.

By Paul Budde, Managing Director of Paul Budde Communication

Paul is also a contributor of the Paul Budde Communication blog located here.

Visit Page

Filed Under


Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet



Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign


Sponsored byDNIB.com


Sponsored byVerisign