Home / Blogs

Assigning 32-bit ASNs

With 16-bit Autonomous System Numbers (ASNs), 65,536 unique numbers are possible. Just like 32-bit IP addresses, these 16-bit ASNs are becoming a scarce resource. Therefore, in 2007 the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) developed a new format, 32-bit ASNs (RFC 4893), which increases the supply of ASNs to four billion.

The RIPE NCC started assigning 32-bit ASNs (or 4-byte ASNs as they are also called) to interested parties in January 2007. Since January 2010, the RIPE NCC has assigned 16 and 32-bit ASNs from a single pool. Upon request, however, the RIPE NCC still assigns 16-bit ASNs.

In Figure 1 below, you can see the distribution of 32-bit ASNs compared to 16-bit ASNs the RIPE NCC assigned since 2007 (Please note that 2011 only include numbers for January—July 2011).

Figure 1: 16-bit (blue) compared to 32-bit (red) ASN assignments by the RIPE NCC

In 2011, roughly one third of all ASNs assigned by the RIPE NCC consisted of 32- bits. This means that even with 32-bit ASNs available since 2007, quite a number of 16-bit ASNs are still being requested. However, as you can see in Figure 2, 54% of all 32-bit ASNs handed out globally have been assigned by the RIPE NCC.

Figure 2: Global 32-bit ASN Distribution by RIR

If operators are using up-to-date equipment and software and their upstream provider supports 32-bit ASNs, they should not experience any problems. The RIPE NCC itself started using 32-bit ASNs in 2007 and has not experienced any problems.

However, as Figure 3 shows, 25% of all 32-bit ASNs assigned by the RIPE NCC, were returned. The main reason for this is that either the user or the upstream provider’s equipment did not support 32-bit ASNs. This is becoming less of a problem as time goes by.

Figure 3: Distribution of RIPE NCC assigned 32-bit ASNs returned, visible and not visible in BGP

Figure 3 shows that 52% of the 32-bit ASNs assigned by the RIPE NCC are visible in the global routing table, as compared to the 23% that are not yet visible. When comparing this with 16-bit ASNs, we found that the visibility of 32-bit ASNs is lagging slightly behind. Overall, we can conclude that the majority of the RIPE NCC membership does not see any operational problems with 32-bit ASNs. Please also see Assigning 32-bit ASNs on RIPE Labs.

Filed Under


Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet



IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global


Sponsored byDNIB.com

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix


Sponsored byVerisign

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign