|
Monetization of DDoS attacks has been core to online crime way before the term cybercrime was ever coined. For the first half of the Internet’s life, DDoS was primarily a mechanism to extort money from targeted organizations. As with just about every Internet threat over time, it has evolved and broadened in scope and objectives.
The new report by Forcepoint Security Labs covering their investigation of the Sledgehammer gamification of DDoS attacks is a beautiful example of that evolution. Their analysis paper walks through both the malware agents and the scoreboard/leaderboard mechanics of a Turkish DDoS collaboration program (named Sath-? Müdafaa or “Surface Defense”) behind a group that has targeted organizations with political ties deemed inconsistent with Turkey’s current government.
In this most recent example of DDoS threat evolution, a pool of hackers is encouraged to join a collective of hackers targeting the websites of perceived enemies of Turkey’s political establishment.
Using the DDoS agent “Balyoz” (the Turkish word for “sledgehammer”), members of the collective are tasked with attacking a predefined list of target sites—but can suggest new sites if they so wish. In parallel, a scoreboard tracks participants use of the Balyoz attack tool—allocating points that can be redeemed against acquiring a stand-alone version of the DDoS tool and other revenue-generating cybercrime tools, for every ten minutes of attack they conducted.
As is traditional in the dog-eat-dog world of cybercrime, there are several omissions that the organizers behind the gamification of the attacks failed to pass on to the participants—such as the backdoor built into the malware they’re using.
Back in 2010, I wrote the detailed paper “Understanding the Modern DDoS Threat” and defined three categories of attackers—Professional, Gamerz, and Opt-in. This new DDoS threat appears to meld the Professional and Opt-in categories into a single political and money-making venture. Not a surprise evolutionary step, but certainly an unwanted one.
If it’s taken six years of DDoS cybercrime evolution to get to this hybrid gamification, what else can we expect?
In that same period of time we’ve seen ad hoc website hacking move from an ignored threat to forcing a public disclosure discourse, to acknowledgment of discovery and remediation, and on to commercial bug bounty platforms.
The bug bounty platforms (such as Bugcrowd, HackerOne, Vulbox, etc.) have successfully gamified the low-end business of website vulnerability discovery—where bug hunters and security researchers around the world compete for premium rewards. Is it not a logical step that DDoS also make the transition to the commercial world?
Several legitimate organizations provide “DDoS Resilience Testing” services. Typically, through the use of software bots they spin up within the public cloud infrastructure, DDoS-like attacks are launched at paying customers. The objectives of such an attack include the measurement and verification of the defensive capabilities of the target’s infrastructure to DDoS attacks, to exercise and test the companies “blue team” response, and to wargame business continuity plans.
If we were to apply the principles of bug bounty programs to gamifying the commercial delivery of DDoS attacks, rather than a contrived limited-scope public cloud imitation, we’d likely have much more realistic testing capability—benefiting all participants. I wonder who’ll be the first organization to master scoreboard construction and incentivisation? I think the new bug bounty companies are agile enough and likely have the collective community following needed to reap the financial rewards of the next DDoS evolutionary step.
Sponsored byCSC
Sponsored byIPv4.Global
Sponsored byDNIB.com
Sponsored byVerisign
Sponsored byRadix
Sponsored byWhoisXML API
Sponsored byVerisign