Home / Blogs

The Internet Must Remain Open - Even for Those We Disagree With

Over the past couple of weeks, following the events in Charlottesville, Virginia, there has been significant discussion in social and traditional media about various technology companies removing websites from their servers, or otherwise making them unavailable.

As the operators of Canada’s Internet domain, we at CIRA are getting numerous inquiries about our stance and policies on this issue. I’d like to use this opportunity to make a couple of clarifications about how CIRA works and what CIRA actually does.

First, and perhaps most importantly, CIRA has no involvement on the content of .CA websites. Our role is to manage the registration of the domain name and to ensure that Registrants (those that register .CA domain names) and Registrars (the organizations that sell the .CA domain to Canadians) meet CIRA’s legal and policy requirements, such as Canadian Presence Requirements. We are also responsible for the safe, secure and stable operation of the underlying domain name system (DNS). We are one part of Canada’s Internet ecosystem, working with registrars and web hosting companies who interact directly with Canadian organizations and individuals who purchase a .CA domain and host relevant content. Policing content is not what we do.

I’ve written before about an open and free Internet, and I stand firm in this belief. I must take this stance even when it supports content that differs from my personal beliefs. Open means open for all.

This doesn’t mean that I don’t struggle with it. I find many of the websites in question repugnant—websites that express derogatory views of people based on their religious beliefs, race, gender or sexual orientation. They go against everything I believe in and the values I teach my children.

But I stand firm that the Internet must remain free and open, and taking actions to remove websites, regardless of how repellent the content, would go directly against this approach. A free and open Internet precludes my personal beliefs related to its content, and I couldn’t continue to lead CIRA, an organization committed to managing Canada’s domain, if I didn’t support this viewpoint for all Canadians, even those I disagree with. One individual should not have the power to make these decisions based on personal beliefs or as an emotional reaction. CIRA has policies in place to ensure this can’t happen.

There is, however, a clear line to this open and free Internet: when laws are broken.

CIRA will assist authorities to remove sites that are breaking the law, be that through hate speech, fraud and others, when presented with a Canadian court order or other judicial instrument. For example, a .CA domain was recently seized by the Edmonton Police Service. This fraudulent site was stealing financial information and money from people, and through a court order, CIRA assisted the Edmonton Police. This is a prime example of a line that was crossed. The proper authorities were involved, a judicial order was sent, and CIRA took appropriate action. We support the ideals of an open Internet but not at the expense of the laws of the land.

To those who reached out to us concerned that we may be participating in what they feel is censorship, you can rest assured we are not. And to those who would like to see us engage in this more heavily by taking down hateful sites, we would ask you to examine these sites and if you feel they are promoting hate speech or breaking the law, contact your local authorities and work with them first. The processes exist for CIRA, as well as our channel partners and Canadian hosting companies, to work with the legal system to prevent criminal activities in our digital space.

An open and free Internet includes the zealots that spout outlandish ideas, and on the other end of the spectrum, cat videos. More importantly, it includes helpful information, art, science and transformative, democratizing thinking. And that is worth protecting, even it if means protecting the others as well.

While I don’t agree with the content of all websites that hold a .CA, I support their right to exist as long as they remain within the bounds of Canadian law. Sites that are racist, sexist or homophobic make sense to many of us to take down. But just because that makes sense to you or me it doesn’t make it right.

Take the Miller test (read up on it here), which is the United States Supreme Court’s three prong obscenity test. One of those prongs relates to the community within which the content exists. The Internet muddies the water here. While content may be published in one community, it can be consumed in another. So how do you define “community” in the Internet age? What is offensive to some, is not to others.

The Internet connects us all, across Canada and beyond. It includes divergent opinions and perspectives on many different issues. It is not for me or CIRA as a whole to decide which opinions are right or wrong, but rather, it is our responsibility to stand by the continuation of an open and free Internet—while also working to protect the .CA space by working within—and helping enforce—Canadian law.

By Byron Holland, President and CEO of CIRA

Filed Under


>There is, however, a clear line to Charles Christopher  –  Aug 31, 2017 2:39 PM

>There is, however, a clear line to this open and free Internet: when laws are broken.

Sounds good, but what about administrative law? Such as a local city council and its ordinances.


“Between the Mutual Film and the Joseph Burstyn decisions local, state, and city censorship boards had the power to edit or ban films. City and state censorship ordinances are nearly as old as the movies themselves, and such ordinances banning the public exhibition of “immoral” films proliferated.”


“Administrative law expanded greatly during the twentieth century, as legislative bodies worldwide created more government agencies to regulate the SOCIAL, economic and political spheres of HUMAN INTERACTION.”

So when the 5 members of my city council decide they do not like a website, that means you will allow them to create and ordinance to have it dezoned?

This threat is a very real one. I sat in a city council meeting in which great deception was taking place in regards to a phantom tax increase, the city moving a cost directly to residents and off its books during a tax increase. Since the two were happening at the same time the city avoided acknowledging the cost shift as a tax increase. Some of us caught the scam. One went before the council and was very articulate as to his concern and that he’d be running against the council chair in the next election. The council chairs response was to call (scream) this individual a “terrorist” in front of everybody ... To which a number of people went to the podium and demanded the chair apologize which he eventually did.

In another meeting the city council past an ordinance to prevent its judge from being sued, that is to keep him from being held accountable for his actions.

I feel the term “law” is not as clear as you suggest, or would like it to be.

Fact is websites do not create the desire for their content.

The desire for their content creates the website, and the traffic which then causes it to grow.

Cause and effect are being flipped around. Unless root causes are addressed, dezoning a website will never eliminate the root cause (desire for its content), what it does is hide the problem so people feel good and live under the illusion that there is no problem since that can’t easily see it. But the toxin remains.

When the toxin is right in front of you you can’t ignore it. You have to form an opinion and make a decision what to do about it == YOU HAVE TO THINK. Its like the irritating grain of sand is to the oyster ....

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet




Sponsored byVerisign

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix


Sponsored byDNIB.com

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API