Home / News

ICANN Must Make User Privacy a Central Tenet for New Registrations, Says EFF

In a statement released today, Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has criticized ICANN for not being proactive on privacy matters, saying the organization “can’t seem to wrap its head around” the issue. EFF sates that the current WHOIS system is fundamentally flawed and that “ICANN must make user privacy a central tenet of any new registration data system.” To achieve that goal, EFF proposes any new system should collect the minimum amount of data required for legitimate purposes, and make such data available only as needed to fulfill such purposes.

By CircleID Reporter

CircleID’s internal staff reporting on news tips and developing stories. Do you have information the professional Internet community should be aware of? Contact us.

Visit Page

Filed Under

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

VINTON CERF
Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Comments

Same old John Levine  –  Sep 10, 2015 4:55 PM

I wish someone at the EFF would realize it’s not 1997 any more, the vast majority of domain registrations are for businesses, and a large fraction of that is for crooked businesses. If they really care about personal privacy, they should start with the tens of thousands of new phishing domains registered every day.

Just out of curiosity John Berryhill  –  Oct 9, 2015 8:41 PM

John, when you say "the vast majority" and "a large fraction", is this in reference to any published numbers on business/non-business domain utilization and crooked/non-crooked businesses? I picture something like "90%" and "1/4" as "vast majority" and "large fraction", but I'm sure those words mean different things to almost everyone who reads them. I'd be interested in seeing the numbers, and the methodology used.

aw, come on John Levine  –  Oct 9, 2015 8:45 PM

I download the .com file every day. You need only look at it to see how obviously true this is.

I've never seen figures supporting what you said John Berryhill  –  Oct 9, 2015 9:46 PM

Honestly. I doubt I could look at 125 million pieces of data and know what 'the vast majority' or a 'large fraction' of them are doing. I was genuinely curious to know if there are any sort of recent utilization figures to wrap my head around what those phrases might suggest.

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

Related

Topics

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPXO

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

Domain Management

Sponsored byMarkMonitor