Why We’ll Never Replace SMTP

Home / Blogs

Why We’ll Never Replace SMTP

	By John Levine Author, Consultant & Speaker
	July 30, 2008 Views: 12,197 Add Comment

An acquaintance asked whether there’s been any progress in the oft-rumored project to come up with a more secure replacement for SMTP. Answer: No

Truly, spam isn’t a technical problem, it’s a social one. If we could figure out some way to make mail recipient networks and hosts willing to shun known bad actors, even at the cost of losing some real mail for a while until the bad actors cave, it would make vastly more difference than any possible technical changes. No matter how super secure an improved protocol is, if a mail system operator lets people send spam through it, the recipients still have to decide how they’re going to deal with the sender’s behavior.

The reason that e-mail is uniquely useful is that you can exchange mail with people you don’t already know. The reason that spam exists is that you can exchange mail with people you don’t already know.

By John Levine, Author, Consultant & Speaker

Filed Under

Comments

The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

VINTON CERF
Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet