Home / Blogs

A Real-Names Domain Registration Policy Would Discourage Political Lying

I’ve discussed the role of the Internet in creating and propagating lies in a previous post, noting that Donald Trump lied more frequently than Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders during the campaign.

Now let’s look at fake news like the claim that Pope Francis had endorsed Trump. The fake post features the following image and includes a “statement” by the Pope in which he explains his decision.

The post evidently originated from the website of a fake news station, WTOE 5. Avarice, not politics, seems to be the motivation for the site since it is covered with ads and links to other “stories” that attack both Clinton and Trump.

WTOE 5 states that it is a satirical site on their about page, but how many readers see that? Other sites do not claim satire. For example, the Christian Times about page says nothing about satire, but does assert that they are not responsible for any action taken by a reader:

Christian Times Newspaper is your premier online source for news, commentary, opinion, and theories. Christian Times Newspaper does not take responsibility for any of our readers’ actions that may result from reading our stories. We do our best to provide accurate, updated news and information.

The Christian Times “editorial” policy is similar to that of WTOE 5—they published pre-election news stories on thousands of dead people voting in Florida, hacking of voter systems by the Clinton campaign, Black Panthers patrolling election sites, etc. As soon as the election was over, they informed us that Hillary Clinton had filed for divorce. Don’t believe it? Here is their evidence:

Given the WTOE 5 claim to be satire or the Christian Times eschewing responsibility for actions taken by readers, I suspect that unless Pope Francis or Hillary Clinton sues, there is no legal recourse.

The dirty tricks during this election remind me of the Watergate burglary, but, unlike Watergate, it is not clear that a law has been broken. In the Watergate case, a crime was committed and the burglars were convicted and sent to prison in 1973. In 1974 investigators were able to establish a White House connection to the burglary and, under threat of impeachment, President Nixon resigned.

Would it be possible to establish a connection between a website like “WTOE 5 News” and the Trump campaign?

A Whois query shows us that the domain name Wto5news.com was registered by DomainsByProxy.com. We can see the address, contact information and names of people at DomainsByProxy.com, but the identity of the person or organization registering the domain name is private.

I also checked the Whois record for the Christian Times. It turns out that DomainsByProxy.com is also the registrar for Christiantimesnewspaper.com and the registration is also private.

I am not a lawyer, but I suspect that a request for a subpoena to get the contact information of a long list of people registering domain names for misleading websites would be seen as a “fishing expedition” by the courts.

I understand the wish to protect the privacy of a person or organization registering a domain name, but there is also a public interest in discouraging sites like Wto5news.com. A verifiable, real-names policy for domain registration would discourage this sort of thing. The WELL, an early community bulletin board system, adopted such a policy years ago. Their slogan is “own your own words” and it serves to keep the discussion civil, stop bullying and lying, etc.

Trump supporters seem to worry a lot about voter fraud. They advocate easing mechanisms for challenging a voter’s registration and encourage strict requirements for proof of identity and residence. There is more evidence of demonstrably fraudulent political information on the Internet than fraudulent voting. If their concern is genuine, they should support a real-names policy for domain registration.

If warrants will not pass legal muster and a real-names policy is unrealistic, someone might be tempted to follow the example of the Trump supporters who hacked the Democratic National Committee and resort to hacking registrars to get contact information of their private clients. Maybe Julian Assange could distribute what they find on WikiLeaks.

By Larry Press, Professor of Information Systems at California State University

He has been on the faculties of the University of Lund, Sweden and the University of Southern California, and worked for IBM and the System Development Corporation. Larry maintains a blog on Internet applications and implications at cis471.blogspot.com and follows Cuban Internet development at laredcubana.blogspot.com.

Visit Page

Filed Under


BuzzFeed blew scam this wide open two Kevin Murphy  –  Nov 17, 2016 4:35 PM

BuzzFeed blew scam this wide open two weeks ago.


But that’s irrelevant.

Trump supporters either a) wouldn’t know what Whois is or b) know what Whois is but don’t care about whether the article is true or not, so long as it supports their guy or makes the other guy look bad.

True -- there have been tons of Larry Press  –  Nov 17, 2016 6:09 PM

True—there have been tons of stories on the fake sites and lies, but few suggestions as to what to do about it. A true-names policy is one small (and controversial) measure. I think prominent buttons on Facebook and other posts to crowd-source junk might also help as well APIs on fact-checking sites to let Facebook, et al, look for likely fakes. What else?

You're assuming people care about truth. They Kevin Murphy  –  Nov 17, 2016 6:19 PM

You're assuming people care about truth. They clearly don't.

Some do; some do not. We all Larry Press  –  Nov 17, 2016 8:06 PM

Some do; some do not. We all confabulate to an extent, but I like to think I would pay attention to a fact-checker calling out a fake pro-Clinton post. (Note that politifact shows that she (and Bernie Sanders and President Obama) lie sometimes—just not nearly as frequently as Trump: http://cis471.blogspot.com/2016/09/lying-crooked-donald.html).

"The power to control language offers far Charles Christopher  –  Nov 20, 2016 12:12 AM

“The power to control language offers far better prizes than taking away people’s provinces
or lands or grinding them down in exploitation. The empires of the future are the empires
of the mind”.
Winston Churchill, Harvard University, Monday 6 September 1943.

“If you do not find a remedy to these evils it is a vain thing to boast of your severity in punishing
theft, which, though it may have the appearance of justice, yet in itself is neither just nor
convenient; for if you suffer your people to be ill-educated, and their manners to be corrupted from
their infancy, and then punish them for those crimes to which their first education disposed them,
what else is to be concluded from this but that you first make thieves and then punish them?”
- Sir Thomas More, Utopia, 1516

The problem starts when I allow someone else to think for me, to perform my research for me. I am not interested in having others “do for me”, nor should anybody else. This is accepting responsibility for self.

Priestcraft, regardless the discipline, is the illusion that we are dependent on others to “do for us”, and thus we become their slave.

Expert opinion, or just opinion? The Famous Brett Watson  –  Nov 20, 2016 5:41 AM

Larry, is this article meant to be an expert opinion, or just an opinion? Everyone’s entitled to their opinions, and I’m not inclined to argue against every single one with which I happen to disagree (life’s too short), but if this is meant to be the expert opinion of a Professor of Information Systems, then I don’t want to let it go unchallenged.

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet



Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign


Sponsored byVerisign

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global


Sponsored byDNIB.com

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix