Home / Blogs

A New Quality gTLD Can Compete with .COM

If you choose a new generic top-level domain (gTLD), will it be able to compete with .com? A recent academic paper indicates that the answer is yes if your new is of outstanding quality.

How Quality Drives the Rise and Fall of High-Tech Products” by professors Tellus, Yin, and Niraj in the Sloan Management Review provides evidence that new products can beat out established rivals, even those with a first-mover advantage, if the new products are especially good. That’s contrary to traditional economic analysis, which holds that early entrants will dominate a market where value increases with the number of participants (i.e., markets where network effects are present. I have elsewhere used economic arguments to point out that multiple viable domain name marketplaces can co-exist).

By way of answer, the professors point out that Word beat WordPerfect and that the iPod beat Sony’s MP3 player. Their explanation: Consumers hesitating between an established product and a newcomer will look for relevant information, most notably product reviews and/or signs that other consumers are buying the newcomer. Exceptional quality is a tested way of generating such information.

The implication for new gTLD registries is to focus on creating high-quality gTLDs from the outset. The finding can also explain the dominance of .com as a brand whose volume of registrations surpassed those of co-existing gTLDs such as .net and .org.

The new analysis supports my view, explained here, on the importance of quality in competing with .com. As I argued, a would-be rival to .com should target businesses that are passionate about being content-quality leaders. And it should make sure that its high quality generates the information that can sway hesitating consumers. The new registry needs to generate positive word of mouth, i.e., actively market the gTLD instead of the traditional thinking of “If we build it, customers will come.”

Not everyone should try to tackle .com. Most applicants should focus on niche strategies in gTLD markets where they have the necessary competencies. But a quality gTLD can indeed trump the established .com, especially with an effective word-of-mouth marketing campaign.

By Alex Tajirian, CEO at DomainMart

Filed Under


Except not... Matt Sergeant  –  Aug 17, 2011 5:02 PM

The truth is that after the sale and setup process there’s no “quality” to be had in a domain name. It’s just a string of characters. The name “facebook.com” is no better or worse than “google.co.uk”, based purely on the TLD.

There are other problems too: Links in IMs and plain text emails won’t auto-link with new gTLDs because they need to hard-code the gTLDs. People buying domains in new gTLDs won’t get the advantages of people sharing them via those transports (unless people are willing to type “http://” in front of their URLs, which I assure you they aren’t). There’s a huge problem of companies being extorted to protect their trademarks, having to buy their domain name in all gTLDs. And then there’s the history we have already seen. Was .info and .biz a success? I doubt anyone outside of domain sellers would argue they have been.

I’m sure some people deciding to invest the $185k will make some money, mostly from spammers and scammers, but compete with .com? I think you’re dreaming.

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet



Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign


Sponsored byVerisign

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global


Sponsored byDNIB.com

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API