Home / Blogs

Identity, ICANN, and Public Meetings

Ok, so I had a day in Wellington that was not busy with other things so I thought I’d wander over to the ICANN venue and sit in on the PUBLIC Forum… I saw friends on the walk over and we entered the venue, chatting about several different things. They pulled out their badges. I didn’t have one. They were admitted, I was denied entrance.

So I talked with one of the local hosts. It seems that ICANN is insistent on all participants executing a registration process where you provide data (name, affiliation, country) and they insist on taking your photograph.

My Photograph? Why? And it turns out that they do not insist on verification of identity, e.g. checking a passport. So I can give a nom’du gar and they will not blink but refusal to have a photograph taken is grounds to refuse registration.

I’ve seen ICANN badges with Bert on them this trip. For me, I’m protesting by listening to the ICANN Public meeting via the net. I’m not sure that registration should be a requirement for participation in a PUBLIC forum.

But I have been wrong before.

Filed Under

Comments

Martin Hannigan  –  Apr 6, 2006 6:24 AM

I observed this repeatedly at the Vancouver ICANN meeting which I attended. This evening, on the ICANN ASO Address Council telephonic meeting bridge call, I made a motion to direct our Chair to object to this practice and I was surprised to find that most of my colleagues were unaware of any issue surrounding this and believed it to be a security precaution. I tabled the motion until the next ICANN ASO Address Council meeting (we are meeting at RIPE Istanbul for our semi- annual-in-person gathering) and will work to gather additional information to present to the Council for a vote and hopeful correspondence to ICANN then.

Martin Hannigan  –  May 25, 2006 4:58 AM

Update:

Unfortunately I was unable to attend the specific meeting the Dr. Twomey stopped by to talk to the ASO AC, but in that meeting it was reported that he was dealing with this issue.

I am under the impression that we may see a change at the next ICANN meeting.

-M<

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

VINTON CERF
Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Related

Topics

DNS

Sponsored byDNIB.com

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign