Home / Blogs

IETF Publishes RFCs on SPF and Sender ID

A recent press release from the Internet Society reports that the IETF will shortly publish specifications of SPF and Sender-ID in the RFC series. What does this mean for the future? Not much.

More than 4000 documents have been published in the RFC series since the first RFC in 1969, relatively few of which have evolved into Internet standards. Each RFC is characterized when published as standards-track, best current practice, informational, experimental, or historical. These four RFCs, three describing Sender ID and one describing SPF, are all experimental.

Last year’s MARID process conspicuously failed to approach the consensus that the IETF requires for standardization, which is the primary reason that the MARID group shut down. Nobody (except perhaps a few hopeful souls at Microsoft) expects anything MARID-like to move forward in the IETF. Yet there’s no question that SPF and Sender ID exist and are each in somewhat wide use, and there’s been quite a lot of data collected on their strengths and weaknesses. These RFCs are basically a final detail of MARID, to document what it did, even though it didn’t get anywhere close to moving anything toward standardization.

Even though this release comes hard on the heels of Microsoft’s new policy that everyone sending mail to Hotmail or MSN will have to identify it with Sender ID, I don’t see any connection. These documents have been working their way through the RFC process since February. Before any RFC can be published, it undergoes editorial review and needs editorial approval from members of the IESG (Internet Engineering Steering Group.) The progress of the review and approval process is documented, here for SPF and here for Sender ID, and they were about done in late May, with a few minor tweaks just completed.

By John Levine, Author, Consultant & Speaker

Filed Under

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

VINTON CERF
Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Comments

Fergie  –  Jun 30, 2005 6:26 PM

Right you are, John, but the market always decides. You can understand, however, how people see the Microsoft announcement as strong-arm tactics….

Michele Neylon  –  Jul 6, 2005 6:50 PM

What is confusing me is that the “help” page on Microsoft.com points to information on SPF, so what is the actual difference, if any, between them? Or is there even a difference worth talking about?

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

Related

Topics

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign

Domain Management

Sponsored byMarkMonitor

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPXO