Home / Blogs

Who is ICANN and Where Does it Fit With Internet Governance?

You’d be surprised how many people are asking that question at the moment, but you won’t be surprised to know that the only thing they agree on is that they either don’t know, or that they disagree with the people that believe they do.

I am not going to attempt to provide my own answer, but I will point to a paper just released by the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST).

POST, among other things, produces regular, concise briefings for the UK Parliament on whatever are the important topics of the time. And they have now done one on Internet Governance, which you can download from them here [PDF], and which we are also hosting here [PDF] (at the same time, they have also produced briefings on “Electricity in the UK” and “Alzheimer’s and Dementia”).

This POST summary finds itself in the pigeon holes of every UK Member of Parliament and often represents the foundation level of information and understanding for UK politicians on a wide range of technical subjects.

As you would expect therefore, the paper is pretty good. Concise, accurate, fair, informative—in fact an ideal primer. It inevitably deals with ICANN a few times, noting that “ICANN’s role generates much debate”.

It gives a brief history of ICANN, goes through the gTLDs introduced over time and is mildly critical of ICANN over IDNs (“some have criticised ICANN for being too slow in implementing IDNs”) - to which it is of course my duty to point to the new IDN roadmap and the dedicated ICANN webpage dealing with internationalised domain names.

It then tries to peek into ICANN’s future, stating: “There are two options for ICANN’s future. The first is to place some of its functions under the authority of an intergovernmental body like the UN or the ITU, an idea originally proposed at the WSIS.

“The second is to give it independent private sector status, with internationalmultistakeholder input. The DTI [Department of Trade and Industry] favours an industry-led solution, arguing that the Internet’s success largely is due to private sector involvement, and that intergovernmentalcontrol may stifle innovation and investment.”

There is much more besides so for anyone interested in Internet Governance, we recommend giving it a read. It is written in clear, approachable English.

It is certainly up there with the primer that Panos did solely on ICANN in time for the World Summit on the Information Society back in November 2005. Some elements of that publication (which you can download here [PDF]from this site, or here [PDF] from Panos directly) are now out of date but even so it is an extremely useful first step for people hoping to understand ICANN and its role.

This post was originally posted on the ICANN Blog.

By Kieren McCarthy, Freelance journalist; Executive Director at IFFOR

Filed Under


Eric Dierker  –  Mar 14, 2007 8:14 PM

I find POST quite enlightening. I find this issue being addressed as very responsible.
However I find it astonishing that ICANN has published no position paper of their own, defining Internet Governance and their perceived role therein.
If they do not know the extent of their mission into the area of governance, all outside opinions are speculative and theoretical.

I note that POST spends little time on the area of everyday practice and does not delve into the founding documents of ICANN to any significant degree.

But, as I say, good job to at least be discussing the issue.


Chris Russell  –  Mar 17, 2007 2:49 PM

This is insane!  Who or what body ever gave ICANN any rights or powers to judge anything about the internet?  Can I start my own group (let’s call it WECANN) and make all the same claims they do.  Oh, might as well make myself and my friends all rich at the same time?  Oh, almost forgot, I’m going to decide what you and everyone else can do on the internet and how you do it.  So funny how easily people are swindled and conned into believing stuff.

I also visited the “official” site of ICANN and was shocked at how little actual information was there.

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet




Sponsored byDNIB.com

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign


Sponsored byVerisign

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC