Home / Blogs

Questions and No Answers to US Oversight transition, ICANN’s Role and Future of Internet Governance

Traditionally, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) coordinates the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) functions, which are key technical services critical to the continued operations of the Domain Name System (DNS). The IANA functions include: (1) the coordination of the assignment of technical protocol parameters including the management of the address and routing parameter area (ARPA) top-level domain; (2) the administration of certain responsibilities associated with Internet DNS root zone management such as generic (gTLD) and country code (ccTLD) Top-Level Domains; (3) the allocation of Internet numbering resources; and (4) other services. ICANN performs the IANA functions under a U.S. Government contract.

ICANN has also evolved in its structures to use the ‘Multistakeholder Model’ in the dissemination of some of its functions and this has seen the creation of working groups and constituencies. ICANNs outputs go through a Policy Development Processes and rely mainly on a bottom up, consensus-driven mechanism.

Recently ICANN has been part of discussions to globalize ICANN’s services in order to broaden ICANN’s reach. This has further been strengthened by the U.S. Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) announcement on its intent to transition key Internet domain name functions to the global multistakeholder community.

NTIA has also asked the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) to convene global stakeholders to develop a proposal to transition the current role played by NTIA in the coordination of the Internet’s domain name system (DNS).

Back ground of internet Governance and Role of ICANN

ICANN’s role has been mainly in the management of the DNS Root, the addressing system of the internet. However there have been discussions and intentions to globalize ICANN’s roles.

During the ITU Conference WCIT-2012, while addressing the opening ceremony, Fadi Chehadé is on record stating that his presence at WCIT-12 is due to his and ICANN’s firm belief in the power of engagement (see: WCIT… In Conclusion). Mr. Chehadé called it new season of engagement at ICANN, and for cooperation between ICANN and ITU, Mr. Chehadé believes that ITU and ICANN have complementary functions to facilitate and in the future, will cooperate in good spirit, while clearly respecting each organization’s distinct roles.

Most recently, post the Snowden revelations on Surveillance, despite ICANN’s distancing itself from it as a cause to accelerate its objective of globalization, ICANN has been seen to take a lead role to transition the ICANN roles away from the USA oversight and into a global structure that is yet to be conceptualized and structured.

Benefits of Multistakeholder Approach

ICANN becomes the center stage of the bottom up process that is the multistakeholder approach, some of the benefits of a multistakeholder approach include:

Bottom up Process

This is a grassroots level contribution mode that thrives rather than the Board of Directors solely declaring what topics ICANN will address, members of working groups and constituencies will structure and develop strategies and way forward proposals that build into acceptable policy document.


Decisions based on consensus provide acceptable results that are agreed upon through majority contributions. This is a magnificent way of dealing with developmental processes; however this advantage can also be a demerit when a minority contribution cannot voice its opinions—however valid they may be.

Focus Areas and the Future of a Globalized ICANN

While the leaders of the Internet technical organizations responsible for coordination of the Internet infrastructure (IETF, IAB, RIRs, ccTLD ROs, ICANN, ISOC, and W3C), welcome the US Government’s announcement of the suggested changes related to the IANA functions contract, the roles on policy development processes of the Internet technical organizations and ICANN’s role as administrator of the IANA functions should remain unchanged.

Accountability and Transparency

The Multistakeholder model thrives on the coalescing of ideas and procedures however this must be matched with an accountable process that has its own structured checks and balances. Without the presence of a transparent way of managing decision making there will arise issues of mistrust and thus accountability will be questioned.

While ICANN seeks to manage its own expanding roles, ICANN must think clearly and develop concise and succinct structures that will create trust within and without ICANN. This way any decisions made as regards development, decline of requests and others will be taken in good faith.

ICANNs expanding role must have a clear oversight so that it can undertake its tasks without the risk of becoming an all powerful institution that is not accountable to anyone. The DNS root is an important tool and resource to the world and as such must be protected from all forms of abuse whether from within ICANN or from governments or institutions. The sanctity and freedom of the internet must be protected from all negative processes or decisions.

Conflict of Interest is an issue that has remained to affect ICANN’s functions and structures. While ICANN and other stakeholders discuss the possibility of expanding its roles, Conflict of Interest within ICANN board and staff must be carefully thought of and honestly discussed and mitigation structures be provided to complement the ICANN Bylaws.

GAC and Governments

ICANN has been in existence since 1998. One of its functions is to deal and work closely with the governments hence the introduction of the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC), which is composed of representatives of a large number of national governments from all over the world.

The GAC as an arm of ICANN currently functions without a defined structure to mitigate its own conflicts of interest and these impacts greatly on the functions and decisions of ICANN. Just as ICANN has created its own ways of managing conflict of interest, GAC which is a point of contact between ICANN and Governments must now be allowed to create a policy document to manage transparency, accountability and conflict of interest issues.

State of Equality of Purpose and Functions in a Globalized ICANN

The Internet is a tool that was developed in the US. ICANN being a US organization is subject to the American constitution and law. As ICANN seeks to expand its roles and become globalized, its functions must be felt by the international users equally and indiscriminately.

Global regulations such as those of the government tend to provide such fairness, since all participants must abide by the same rules. It is clear that not all regions in the world share the same level of technology or awareness to the impacts on the internet, Africa is such an example.

ICANN’s roles must therefore be introduced to all regions irrespective of their status in technology. This means that the regional Internet registries (RIRs) as organizations that manage the allocation and registration of Internet number resources within a particular region will continue to expand and deliver services equally.

By Gideon Rop, Project Manager: DCA Registry Services Kenya and ISOC Kenya Member

He is an Internet Governance enthusiast and technology critic, an active member of ISOC Kenya who participates regularly in Internet Governance, DNS and Security Fora, and in ICANN GNSO working groups.

Visit Page

Filed Under


Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet



Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global


Sponsored byDNIB.com

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign


Sponsored byVerisign

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC