Home / News

PIR Invites Bids for .Org Back-End Operations

In a post today, Public Interest Registry (PIR), the not-for-profit operator of the .org, .ngo and .ong domains, has announced a Request for Information for the management of its back-end registry services. Afilias which has been the technical provider for PIR since it was established by ISOC following the successful ISOC/Afilias strategic partnership in the bid for .ORG in 2002, says it has been expecting an RFP since the last contract was signed and that it remains committed to its continued work with the organization.

By CircleID Reporter

CircleID’s internal staff reporting on news tips and developing stories. Do you have information the professional Internet community should be aware of? Contact us.

Visit Page

Filed Under


it may be time for ISC to bid again Paul Vixie  –  Feb 17, 2016 2:36 AM

when we bid on this the first time (when ORG first separated from the netsol/verisign world), ISC was dismissed by ICANN early in the eval process, as lacking experience in DNS operations. apparently operating root servers since the mid 1990’s doesn’t count, even though in the early years, that included COM/NET/ORG and IN.ADDR.ARPA as well.

I agree - ISC would indeed be Doug Mehus  –  Feb 17, 2016 11:27 PM

I agree - ISC would indeed be a good bidder. You should consider it, Paul, particularly since the launch of all these new gTLDs, there are quite a few new registry operators and back-end service providers to the registry operators since you'd bid on it as well. And yeah, I remember reading something about you guys apparently lacking the technical aptitude to manage the back-end for a gTLD registry and found that funny at the time (and still do) that, apparently, having been one of the original & current operators of at least one (or multiple?) root servers *didn't* count. ;) Cheers, Doug

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet



Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign


Sponsored byDNIB.com

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global


Sponsored byVerisign

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API