Home / Blogs

A Case for Dot-Outlet TLD

This post outlines the correct use of an outlet strategy, points out the value of such a strategy, and the advantages of executing the strategy through a new ICANN top-level domain (TLD) instead of a second-level domain name.

Some companies need to signal a brand name with low prices and quality/utility, whether the strategy is for a primary or secondary corporate brand. A successful strategy has to explicitly include lower price and quality. Otherwise, with only a lower price, a brand owner would cannibalize the main brand and cause damage to brand equity.

Dot-outlet and dot-bargain are two TLD candidates for achieving the signal. For example, established brand owners can use dot-outlet instead of dot-bargain because high-price items of high quality can be bargains. Others may use dot-bargain to signal low prices and possibly low quality.

Such TLD signaling is valuable only when there is a robust demand for the implied messages. In addition to signaling outlet features noted above, the TLD can be used by established firms in good times to capture adjacent markets and to deter competitors from adopting a low-end entry strategy. Moreover, when economic conditions are tight, the price-quality signaling strategy can be a desirable complement to the main brand when lower quality is properly communicated. Nonetheless, dot-outlet can be used as a low-end market entry strategy in its own right.

There is also an indirect benefit to an outlet message, namely that it can reduce certain customer motivations to purchase counterfeits. People who want a low price but who don’t want to buy counterfeits may find what they’re looking for at an outlet. But brand owners need to do their part by educating customers that fakes are of inferior quality.

The benefits of signaling through a TLD instead of a second-level domain name (say, “BrandOutlet.com” vs. “Brand.Outlet”) are:

  1. A potential customer who is not familiar with the brand may not realize there is a strong brand name associated with the outlet. Thus, the domain name signal might be interpreted as an inferior brand name.
  2. New TLDs may lead to the reemergence of Web site indexes, similar to earlier versions of Yahoo but with automated indexing based on the TLD. Under such a scenario, BrandOutlet.com may not be indexed or receive a high result rank.
  3. Dot-Outlet is a sharper, shorter, and concise signal, which need not be the case with some of the new TLDs (see Benefits of New TLDs as Shorter Domain Names Are Dubious).
  4. In crafting their domain names, cybersquatters may use not only the brand but also potentially confusing descriptors, such as “low prices” and “genuine.” Thus, under a dot-outlet regime, customers will be suspicious of such domain names and there will be less demand for them, which will also reduce counterfeits. Nevertheless, there is no guarantee that suspicious descriptors would not be introduced as new TLDs. The difference is that there are forces working against such new TLDs: a. High fixed application fees and operating costs act as an entry barrier. b. The importance of educating the public about various aspects of online crime will increase. Such eduction should include warnings about certain types of new TLDs. c. Search engines may exclude TLDs that are primarily intended to confuse customers.
  5. Demand for brand enhancement through “Generics.outlet” will increase competition for the TLD. These domain names will provide complementary information to an existing branded domain name. But they are also valuable as independent sites.

By Alex Tajirian, CEO at DomainMart

Filed Under


Alex,The arguments for a .outlet TLD are Kevin Ohashi  –  Oct 30, 2009 5:30 AM

The arguments for a .outlet TLD are some of the weakest I’ve seen of all the new TLD arguments.

1.  A customer who is confused by BrandOutlet.com and not Brand.Outlet?  I would say 1:1000 customers would fit that scenario, while 999:1000 wouldn’t understand .outlet (conservative estimate).

2.  You want the web go backwards in technology?  Let’s get back to directories… because they were an effective way of indexing before.

3.  It amazes me you address all the problems of new TLDs in here such as this:

1. Rebranding under a new TLD costs money and can result in traffic loss—for example, when a new TLD operator shuts down or when search engines exclude intentionally confusing TLDs.
2. Search cost with current search technology is not reduced and may increase.
3. Some TLDs will provide fuzzy and potentially confusing messages.

and think .outlet is a good idea as if it magically overcomes these problems.

4.  Cybersquatters will also not care because there won’t be any traffic, a far more effective means.  Take .biz for example, nobody cares about it despite it being targeted for ‘biziness’

5.  How is it any different than GenericOutlet.com?  Seems more like an excuse than anything else.

This is new TLDs at their worst, no innovation, weak arguments and quite frankly a waste of money.

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet



Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC


Sponsored byDNIB.com

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API


Sponsored byVerisign

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global