Home / Blogs

Does Online Privacy ‘Really’ Matter? ‘No’ According to Consumers

In introducing yet another online privacy bill, Sen. Ernest Hollings (D-S.C.) claimed that “privacy fears are stifling the development and expansion of the Internet as an engine of economic growth.” Certainly, surveys consistently show that consumers express concern about Internet privacy. For example, in a June 2002 Jupiter report, 70% of online consumers said they worried about online privacy.

But what do these surveys really prove? If consumers are really concerned about their online privacy, their behavior doesn’t show it.

For example, consumers say they want more information about privacy practices. In a January 2002 Consumer WebWatch survey, 93% of e-commerce site users said it was very important that sites disclose their privacy practices.

But consumers don’t read privacy policies. A November 2001 Privacy Leadership Initiative survey showed that only 3% read privacy policies carefully, and 64% only glanced at—or never read—privacy policies. Actual readership may be even lower; the New York Times reported that only 0.3% of users read Yahoo’s privacy policy in a one month period last Spring.

Also, entrepreneurs have responded to consumer concerns by offering privacy management tools, such as tools to browse anonymously, manage cookies and manage email. However, these tools have had limited success, and many vendors no longer focus on consumer sales. So, although consumers can take technological steps to protect their privacy, few do.

“You can do a survey and consumers say that they are very concerned about their privacy; then you offer them a discount for a book and they’ll tell you everything.”

Further, consumers sell their personal data incredibly cheaply. Says leading Internet pundit Esther Dyson, “you can do a survey and consumers say that they are very concerned about their privacy; then you offer them a discount for a book and they’ll tell you everything.” Indeed, a June 2002 Jupiter report said that 82% would give personal information to new shopping sites to enter a $100 sweepstakes.

So why do consumers’ stated privacy concerns diverge from their behavior?

First, survey questions usually ask consumers if they consider privacy a benefit. That’s only half the equation. More revealing is how much consumers will pay—either in time or money—for such benefits. While surveys might help answer this question, actual consumer behavior yields far greater insights.

Second, consumers don’t have uniform interests. Regarding online privacy, consumers can be segmented into 2 groups: Activists, who actively protect their online privacy, and Apathetics, who do little or nothing to protect themselves. Activists are very vocal, but they appear to be a tiny market segment.

This psychographic segmentation illustrates why broad-based online privacy regulation is unnecessary. Activists, by definition, take care of themselves. They demand privacy protections from businesses and, if they don’t get it, use technology to protect themselves or take their business elsewhere.

In contrast, mainstream consumers don’t change their behavior based on online privacy concerns. If these people won’t take even minimal steps to protect themselves, why should government regulation do it for them?

Further, online businesses invest in privacy when it’s profitable. Privacy initiatives are like any other marketing decision—companies pursue such initiatives when enough consumers care about privacy to generate more revenues than the initiatives cost. When consumers don’t care about privacy, neither do companies.

Thus, consumer behavior tells companies what level of privacy to provide. We should let the market continue unimpeded rather than chase phantom consumer fears through unnecessary regulation.

By Eric Goldman, Professor, Santa Clara University School of Law

Filed Under


Prndll  –  Dec 2, 2003 10:14 PM

There is no such thing as “online privacy”. People don’t seem concerned about it just simply because they ASSUME that what they do is private. The internet is “open”. Most people don’t know that they leave tracks when they surf. For those that know, most don’t know how to prevent or irradicate those tracks. Any survey of this kind is to proceed under a false presumption. The key to most problems lies in the attitude and knowledge of the end user. This whole thing demands that poeple take the time and initiative to learn——otherwise, suffer the consequences. The proof of everything I say is plastered all over the net…..

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet



New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix


Sponsored byVerisign

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global


Sponsored byDNIB.com

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API