|
Today, the national governments that constitute ICANN’s Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) for the first time publicly voiced their concerns over specific new Top-Level Domain (TLD) applications in the form of Early Warnings.
More than 240 individual GAC Early Warnings were issued in relation to 200 new TLD applications which account for 162 unique strings.
By far the most prolific government to issue GAC Early Warnings was the Australian government with 129. This was followed by Germany with 20 and France 19.
As expected, a large number of the 240 Early Warnings related to closed generic string TLD applications (100 Early Warnings). It appears a number of governments are concerned about brands or entrepreneurs owning a specific generic word and closing the door on public registrations in these namespaces.
Early Warnings were also issued for strings that are linked to regulated market sectors, such as the financial, health and charity sectors.
The continent with the most Early Warnings was Asia Pacific (154), followed by Europe (51) and Africa (30). This is in stark contrast to the distribution of new TLD applications across the globe which saw more than 80% of applicants come from North America and Europe.
Other interesting insights include:
Below is an image which provides an overview of the distribution of GAC Early Warnings.
GAC’s Early Warning – An overview of the distribution of GAC Early Warnings (Click to Enlarge)
A GAC Early Warning is a mechanism by which the national government representatives who comprise the GAC can signal their potential concerns with specific new TLD applications that are controversial or sensitive. Receipt of a GAC Early Warning allows an applicant to be eligible to receive an 80% refund of their application fee.
Many Early Warnings offer remediation steps to be taken by the applicant which may appease any concerns the governments have. However, applicants are not obliged to take any action.
GAC Early Warnings are a pathway to formal GAC Advice to the ICANN Board in April 2013 following ICANN Beijing. GAC Advice requires consensus of the GAC and may indicate that a particular application should not proceed which almost certainly means an application will not be approved by ICANN. The biggest question moving forward will be how exactly consensus will be reached. Watch this space!
While many applicants were nervously anticipating the announcement of today’s Early Warnings, the majority of applicants will be pleased with the results. Next hurdle: GAC Advice in April 2013.
NOTE: Every effort has been made to accurately report the statistics in this blog. However, some statistics may need to be updated with further analysis
Sponsored byCSC
Sponsored byWhoisXML API
Sponsored byVerisign
Sponsored byDNIB.com
Sponsored byVerisign
Sponsored byIPv4.Global
Sponsored byRadix
After reviewing the GAC Early Warning List, it is clear that it is just a representative sample. I would expect many more applications to be flagged once the GAC takes a more in-depth review of the list.
“The string (.fillintheblank)is linked to a regulated market sector, and dot Accountant Limited does not appear to have proposed sufficient mechanisms to
minimise potential consumer harm.”
There are many strings that fall into this category that were not identified.