Home / Blogs

Colloquium on Collisions: Expert Panelists to Select Papers, Award $50K First Prize

According to the Online Etymology Dictionary, the verb collide is derived from the Latin verb collidere, which means, literally, “to strike together”: com- “together” + lædere “to strike, injure by striking.”

Combined instead with loquium, or “speaking,” the com- prefix produces the Latin-derived noun colloquy: “a speaking together.”

Researchers and practitioners know well the benefits of the colloquium, the technical conference, a gathering of those speaking together on a topic.

So consider WPNC 14—the upcoming namecollisions.net workshop—a colloquium on collisions: speaking together to keep name spaces from striking together.

Allison Mankin, director of Verisign Labs, has assembled an outstanding technical program committee to select the papers to be presented at this March 8-10 event in London:

(Allison and I are also members.)

The program committee will make the careful decisions over the coming weeks about which papers to accept for presentation at the workshop. From among the papers presented, the prize committee—a subset of the program committee—will then award $50,000 for the most valuable research contribution, the one that most advances the state of knowledge and/or most deeply analyzes and mitigates risk. A second prize of $25,000, and up to five third prizes of $10,000 each, also may be awarded.

Having a paper accepted at a selective workshop is itself a recognition of the strength of a research contribution. This workshop aims to do even more: to reward the strongest of the contributions with cash prizes that can both focus attention on this area of emerging importance, and encourage and support further work.

The panelists’ expert decision-making will be key to the success of the workshop as well as its ongoing impact. My appreciation to them and their organizations for their commitment to this “colloquy”—and to helping us look both ways before crossing to avoid the “collidere.”

Paper submissions are due Feb. 10. For more information on the workshop, competition and rules, please visit http://namecollisions.net.

By Dr. Burt Kaliski Jr., Senior VP and Chief Technology Officer at Verisign

He leads Verisign’s long-term research program. Through the program’s innovation initiatives, the CTO organization, in collaboration with business and technology leaders across the company, explores emerging technologies, assesses their impact on the company’s business, prototypes and evaluates new concepts, and recommends new strategies and solutions. Burt is also responsible for the company’s industry standards engagements, university collaborations and technical community programs.

Visit Page

Filed Under

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

VINTON CERF
Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Comments

Does this mean that all these people Andrew Gardner  –  Feb 6, 2014 1:57 AM

Does this mean that all these people STILL thing that all NXDOMAIN log entries are caused by “collisions”?

Sigh.

Isn’t there SOMEONE out there in dnsengineerville that is openminded enough to admit that a lot of the NXDOMAIN traffic is the direct result of announcements/PR regarding the newGTLD program itself? Failure to take that into account in any research brings such research into question, and will have (and already is having) an adverse effect on the newGTLD program.

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

Related

Topics

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign