NordVPN Promotion

Home / Blogs

The Essential Ingredient of Politics Is Timing

The transition of the IANA contract oversight is, of course, the topic du jour at ICANN 50 in London. From the sessions to the hallway banter, it’s the hottest topic I can recall in ICANN’s history.

It’s an inherently over-the-top political topic, merging partisan politics in Washington with Internet governance. On numerous occasions in Singapore, Larry Strickling raised the domestic politicking on the part of the Republican Party regarding the IANA oversight transition, cautioning us of the discourse fuelled by opportunism.

He was right.

We now have two Republican-backed amendments that have passed the House of Representatives that are intended to delay, if not block, the transition of the IANA contract oversight. Phillip Corwin has published some excellent posts on CircleID on the topic, detailing the amendments and how they can impact our process.

Are the amendments simply political posturing? Or do they represent the true feelings of the Republican Party? If they do, then there is a risk as we are heading into mid-term elections this Fall. The Republicans have the opportunity to control both the House of Representatives and the Senate, effectively cutting President Obama off at the knees.

Regardless, it’s good politics on the part of the Republicans. We’ve all seen the headlines—Obama is giving the Internet over to either communists or terrorist or some combination of the two. The IANA transfer has basically allowed the Republicans to stick a political fork in Obama’s eye, and they are all too happy to do as much damage as they can in the process.

No big deal, right? After all, both Larry Strickling and Fadi Chehade have characterized the September 2015 date as a goal and not a deadline. It’s more important that we do it right, they say, than to do it quickly. It is possible to extend the contract, if necessary, to make sure the outcome will meet all of NTIA’s criteria and to encompass the reviews necessary to alleviate the concerns of the Republicans.

While I agree with the sentiment (of course it needs to be done right), I’m not convinced it is helpful to characterize the date in such a manner. Though I’m not hearing much in London about the amendments, I think they are something we ignore at our own peril.

Geographic proximity and personal interest have made me an observer of American politics, and I can tell you I can see a few things that may affect our process.

First over the next year the Democrats in Washington may effectively be frozen. If the Republicans take over both houses, Obama will be a lame duck president of the highest order, making it incredibly difficult to push the IANA transition through in political ecosystem.

Second, history shows us that key staff exits Capitol Hill in the final year of a president’s term, knowing that the next regime will bring in their own staff. (To be perfectly clear, this is a general political observation—I have no personal insight whatsoever into the future of any senior officials in the U.S.)

This could very well mean that the architects and supporters who are in positions of influence could likely be long gone before the end of Obama’s presidency in 2016, leaving the IANA transition without a champion in any influential positions.

The upshot of this is clear in my thinking—if the Democrats are stripped of power, the likelihood of seeing the IANA oversight transition become a reality, if we miss the September 2015 date, is significantly reduced. And, without champions in influential positions on the Hill, it’s far less likely that the process will be taken up under a new regime in 2016. Who would want to reinvigorate a failed process and all of the political risks that go with it?

Pierre Trudeau, a former Canadian prime minister, once said “The essential ingredient of politics is timing.” We should heed his advice. In part, we are playing a political game with the IANA contract, and the stakes are high. Let’s consider the September 2015 date as a deadline. We now have external pressures, such as the Republican’s delay tactics, to deal with.

As the global community who are committed to seeing the Internet succeed (and the transition of the IANA contract and the USG oversight role is something most of us agree is a big step in the right direction), let’s work together to ensure we meet that deadline.

NORDVPN DISCOUNT - CircleID x NordVPN
Get NordVPN  [74% +3 extra months, from $2.99/month]
By Byron Holland, President and CEO of CIRA

Filed Under

Comments

"cautioning us of the discourse fuelled by opportunism" John Berryhill  –  Jul 1, 2014 4:02 PM

Is there any other kind these days?

The entire business of being a political consultant derives from an exceedingly simple formula exemplified by the character of “Harold Hill” from The Music Man - Find some Mcguffin with which most people are unfamiliar, make it into some kind of existential threat, and persuade them that the only way to counter that threat coincidentally involves putting money in your pocket or those of your friends.

There are any number of political action groups premised on that formula. 

Never mind the fact that the purpose for which ICANN was formed was to get the DoC out of the internet name and number assignment business in the first place.  Not when there is money to be had. 

We saw the same thing happen with the “Panama Canal Giveaway” which was loudly trumpeted to be some sort of initiative invented by evil politicians in the 1970’s intent on subverting US sovereignty, instead of the fairly mundane fact that the canal was always subject to a term-limited lease.  The boring details do not matter when one is in the outrage-frothing business. 

It’s kind of an odd fit for Republicans, whose general stance is that “government can’t do anything right” and that government should not be involved in managing or regulating pretty much anything at all.  The list extends from Social Security to health insurance, utilities, the delivery of mail, and even the operation of prisons.  But, internet name and number allocation policy?  Heaven forfend!  To the fainting couch!  Give until it hurts!

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

Related

Topics

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

DNS

Sponsored byDNIB.com

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

NordVPN Promotion