Home / Blogs

Why This Domain Expert Has Stopped Talking About Domain Names

I’m lucky enough to spend my working life helping some of the world’s largest brands drive their .brand TLD projects.

The excitement and the challenges of this space stem largely from the fact that this is a new innovation; and when you’re working with something truly groundbreaking, naturally there’s an element of “learning as you go.”

And I’m not afraid to admit, sometimes we get things wrong.

The more I talk to .brand owners, the more they’re teaching me where the value of .brands is.

And newsflash: it’s not in domain names.

We’re becoming more and more aware of the potential of .brands as a true disruptor in digital marketing. While on a basic level, a .brand TLD allows an organization to rethink its domain name strategy, the business and marketing impacts of this asset are much more far-reaching.

But in order to execute on this, we need to get the senior marketers and brand managers on board.

And until now, I (and perhaps we as an industry) haven’t done a great job of that.

For many in the .brands space, the challenge of engaging internal stakeholders in .brand projects is heightened by the jargon, history and technical nature of the domain name industry.

While some technical details are of course necessary, it’s easy to lose people in the chaos of domain name language—from ICANN to gTLDs to DNS to second-level domains.

So we’re changing the conversation.

Instead of ‘domain names’, we’re realizing the power of talking about ‘improved customer experience’.

Instead of saying “you can create this new domain”, we explain how “customers can find what they want faster and more intuitively”.

Instead of talking about websites and web pages, we talk about your holistic digital presence, and the identity it conveys to your audience.

More and more, we’re finding our discussions with .brands now include senior marketers and those in charge of branding and customer experience.

And we’re quickly discovering that the story we’ve been telling just doesn’t land with this audience… and neither should it.

Because the truth of it is, that .brands are not about domain names.

And talking about domain names to your marketing team could be what’s killing your .brand project.

I spoke about this recently in a presentation at the Global Domains Division (GDD) Summit in Spain.

It’s a message that’s resonated so strongly, we’ll continuing the discussion at an upcoming .brands webinar on June 1st—check out more information here and register to attend.

If we as an industry want to see .brands succeed, we need to speak the language of our key audience: the marketers. Not only that, but we need to recognize that the value of .brands doesn’t lie in domain names, and instead build an approach that looks holistically at marketing, branding and online identity.

My name is Tony Kirsch and I’m a domain name junkie. But the first step is acknowledging the problem—and committing to discovering a better road ahead.

A version of this post was originally published on MakeWay.World.

By Tony Kirsch, Head of Professional Services at GoDaddy Registry

Filed Under


Great article. The single greatest achievement one Alan Dunn  –  May 31, 2017 12:50 PM

Great article. The single greatest achievement one could make in this industry is coin another word for “domain name” which invokes the power, meaning and emotion many of us in the industry understand and feel passionate about, yet is adopted and embraced by the brand world. It’s truly ironic in many ways - that in a world of naming we, as an industry, are stuck with a product name that consistently causes challenges and/or simplifies the offering. Reminds me of the dated term classified ads, and the introduction of the term “local listings”, which paved a more engaged discussion for these type of placements.

I do think it is near impossible (in my opinion) to adopt a brand-worthy title to domain names as a whole since the volume of cheap sellers, poor quality domain names and over hyped auctions will be too much of a negative element to support the quality of the brand message hoping to be delivered.

In order for a term to be adopted with success there has to be a distinct separation between .brand applications and .gTLDs, and a term coined for those products (.brands) which truly evokes the intended message. I am not sure what that name is, but would certainly look forward to seeing it one day.

Great to read this, and see someone write about acknowledging the problem.

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet



Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global


Sponsored byDNIB.com

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC


Sponsored byVerisign