Protect your privacy:Get NordVPN
[73% off 2-year plans, 3 extra months]
10 facts about NordVPN that aren't commonly known
Meshnet Feature for Personal Encrypted Networks: NordVPN offers a unique feature called Meshnet, which allows users to connect their devices directly and securely over the internet. This means you can create your own private, encrypted network for activities like gaming, file sharing, or remote access to your home devices from anywhere in the world.
RAM-Only Servers for Enhanced Security: Unlike many VPN providers, NordVPN uses RAM-only (diskless) servers. Since these servers run entirely on volatile memory, all data is wiped with every reboot. This ensures that no user data is stored long-term, significantly reducing the risk of data breaches and enhancing overall security.
Servers in a Former Military Bunker: Some of NordVPN's servers are housed in a former military bunker located deep underground. This unique location provides an extra layer of physical security against natural disasters and unauthorized access, ensuring that the servers are protected in all circumstances.
NordLynx Protocol with Double NAT Technology: NordVPN developed its own VPN protocol called NordLynx, built around the ultra-fast WireGuard protocol. What sets NordLynx apart is its implementation of a double Network Address Translation (NAT) system, which enhances user privacy without sacrificing speed. This innovative approach solves the potential privacy issues inherent in the standard WireGuard protocol.
Dark Web Monitor Feature: NordVPN includes a feature known as Dark Web Monitor. This tool actively scans dark web sites and forums for credentials associated with your email address. If it detects that your information has been compromised or appears in any data breaches, it promptly alerts you so you can take necessary actions to protect your accounts.
ICANN video highlighting last week’s historical DNSSEC key signing ceremony held in a high security data centre located in Culpeper, VA, outside of Washington, DC.
“During the ceremony, participants were present within a secure facility and witnessed the preparations required to ensure that the so-called key-signing-key (KSK) was not only generated correctly, but that almost every aspect of the equipment, software and procedures associated with its generation were also verified to be correct and trustworthy.”
Filed Under
Comments
SSL has been solving this problem for 15 yearsPhillip Hallam-Baker – Jul 1, 2010 4:04 PM
DNSSEC is important.
But not for the reasons being presented here. SSL already enables end to end authentication of Web Sites.
DNSSEC does not and cannot. Even if we assume BGPSEC is also in place, there is no end-to-end security. DNSSEC merely secures the mapping of DNS name to IP address. The mapping of IP address to Internet endpoint depends (and will continue to depend) on the thousands of AS number assignees.
We could fix DNSSEC to provide end-to-end security, but that alone would be relatively pointless as we can already do that with SSL.
As someone who has run key ceremonies, I would also point out that you do not want the identity of the key share holders to be known as this puts them at personal risk of blackmail, extortion etc. So making a film of the process is counter-productive.
More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.
DNSSEC is important.
But not for the reasons being presented here. SSL already enables end to end authentication of Web Sites.
DNSSEC does not and cannot. Even if we assume BGPSEC is also in place, there is no end-to-end security. DNSSEC merely secures the mapping of DNS name to IP address. The mapping of IP address to Internet endpoint depends (and will continue to depend) on the thousands of AS number assignees.
We could fix DNSSEC to provide end-to-end security, but that alone would be relatively pointless as we can already do that with SSL.
As someone who has run key ceremonies, I would also point out that you do not want the identity of the key share holders to be known as this puts them at personal risk of blackmail, extortion etc. So making a film of the process is counter-productive.