Home / Blogs

WLS Deemed Illegal by Registrar Coalition

ICANN’s announcement of a “Special Meeting of the Board”, to be held on February 18, 2004, includes a number of topics in its “Proposed Agenda” including: “WLS Negotiations with VeriSign”. In reaction to this particular item related to WLS, Newman & Newman, the law firm representing an ad hoc coalition of ICANN-accredited domain name registrars, has sent a letter to Dr. Paul Twomey, President and CEO of ICANN expressing:

“We are aware the ICANN Board is scheduled to meet tomorrow, Wednesday, February 18, 2004 to discuss the proposed WLS. As ICANN’s negotiations with VeriSign have been neither open nor transparent, we have no way of knowing the specific issues that the Board intends to cover. However, in the event the WLS is authorized as publically proposed, ICANN, VeriSign, and any registrars that offer the WLS will be in violation of numerous laws, some of which are summarized below. Accordingly, we request that the ICANN Board of Directors withdraw its approval of the WLS until such time as the issues raised herein have been addressed to our clients’ satisfaction. Otherwise, our clients will take legal action to enjoin the WLS and recover any damages they may suffer.”

As indicated in the above quote, the letter has pointed out that “WLS will be in violation of numerous laws” including:

1. The WLS violates the FTC act and state consumer protection laws
2. The WLS is an illegal lottery
3. The WLS is anti-competitive
4. The WLS defrauds consumers
5. ICANN places no competitive restrictions on VeriSign

The letter concludes that:

“Approval of the WLS should be withdrawn, or, at a minimum, delayed until such time as ICANN can: 1) solicit an advisory opinion from the FTC on the impact of the WLS on consumers; 2) prevent the sale of subscriptions to domains that are not scheduled to expire during the trial period; 3) prevent the sale of subscriptions to domains consisting of registered trademarks, 4) prevent the sale of subscriptions to current registrants of the domain names subscribed, and 5) impose meaningful limitations on Verisign’s ability to use the WLS notwithstanding this letter, our clients will take all necessary measure to protect their interests.”

For other related discussions on this issue see:

- ICANNWatch: “Registrar Coalition Threatens to Sue ICANN If WLS Approved”
- Lextext: “Registrars Send Demand Letter on WLS”
- CircleID Special Coverage: “Wait Listing Service Controversy”

By CircleID Reporter

CircleID’s internal staff reporting on news tips and developing stories. Do you have information the professional Internet community should be aware of? Contact us.

Visit Page

Filed Under


Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet



New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC


Sponsored byVerisign

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global


Sponsored byDNIB.com