Home / Blogs

Financial Times on Telecoms Separation

I’ve written that a Network Neutrality law needs a Network Management Exception, and I’ve laid out how this exception is likely to become a giant vacuum-cleaner-fish loophole. The way out is the separation of infrastructure from service, so infrastructure operators can have no financial interests in the services they carry, hence no motive to discriminate in anti-competitive ways.

Now today’s Financial Times has an editorial on the EC telecom regulator, Viviane Reding’s proposal to beef up national telecom regulatory authority within European countries and create a Europe-wide so-called super-regulator. The editorial endorses functional telecom separation, saying,

...the commissioner has proposed allowing national watchdogs to force large operators to split the parts of their businesses that manage network infrastructure from those that provide services to consumers.

This “functional separation” makes sense. In the UK, BT’s decision to create a separate infrastructure subsidiary has, arguably, improved access for rival providers. Greater competition and broadband use followed.

But the FT is skeptical of the super-regulator concept—as was I when I read about it!—saying,

The proposals for an EU super-regulator, and for the European Commission to be able to veto decisions by national watchdogs it does not like, are more worrying. There, Ms Reding has gone too far. Her premise is that regulatory consistency is needed and some watchdogs are too close to big telecoms providers to be trusted. But it is hard to see how the proposals will not create extra bureaucracy. They smack, too, of a “one-size-fits-all” strategy.

The FT proposes a “Lamfalussy committee” alternative. (Never heard of it.) The FT says that such a body would, “... enable the regulators to offer legislative advice and co-ordinate action among member states…”

I’m curious how a super-regulator or a Lamfalussy committee avoids regulatory capture. Anyhow, I’m off to Google Lamfalussy…

By David Isenberg, Principal Prosultant(sm), isen.com, LLC

Filed Under


Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet



IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign


Sponsored byVerisign

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API


Sponsored byDNIB.com

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC