Home / Blogs

A Public Briefing on ICANN, Internet Governance and Africa

The Collaboration for International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) recently published “ICANN, Internet governance and Africa”, a public briefing on the current status and key points of the debate that provides essential background for the second phase of the World Summit on Information Society (WSIS).

During the last few years the relationship of African stakeholders with ICANN has received greater attention, largely driven by a few key individuals within African governments, the technical community, and civil society organizations. Meanwhile, the broader topic of Internet governance has been put on the public agenda in the context of the WSIS. And the United Nations-sponsored Working Group on Internet Governance has spent the last year reviewing the many issues within that broad rubric, including the responsibilities currently under the purview of ICANN. Decisions taken at the upcoming second phase of the WSIS (to occur in Tunis in November 2005) are likely to have a profound impact on ICANN and the field of Internet governance more generally.

If African stakeholders are to have a real say in the discussion—whether in the short term through the WSIS process, or in the longer term through ICANN and/or whatever new structures emerge—they need a basic understanding of ICANN’s role and functions and how it fits within the Internet governance area more broadly. Being generally informed on the issues may be as relevant to a ground-level NGO as it is to a government official—even if the conclusion is that governments should leave Internet technical management to the technical community.

While the issues at stake have the potential to affect all current and future Internet users, the Internet governance field tends to be dominated by a handful of experts and interested parties, many of whom have dedicated their careers to understanding the political and technical minutiae involved. In Africa, only a few are in the position to dedicate fulltime attention to the dialogue, which occurs both online and in numerous face-to-face meetings around the world.

For those who are interested in the issues but do not have the resources to follow the details, this brief explains the current status and key points of the discussion on ICANN and Internet governance as relevant to Africa.

CIPESA director Vincent Waiswa Bagiire said, “Before now there was no single place where all the basic facts about Africa’s participation in ICANN could be found. So learning about the issues required a lot of Internet research, and some savvy to find the best online sources—which isn’t simple because connectivity is so costly in Africa. This document brings it all together, and tells you where to find out more.”

The brief sets out basic facts and describes opinions about the main issues for African stakeholders. It provides an overview of ICANN, noting what it does and does not do. And it describes the main points of the WGIG report, considering what the findings could mean for ICANN’s future role in the management of Internet resources, and where the debate will play out leading up to, and beyond, the second phase of WSIS. Finally, it looks at views on why Africa should care about ICANN—and why not.

The full briefing is available at CIPESA website.

By Teresa Peters, bridges.org

Filed Under


Randy Bush  –  Oct 13, 2005 1:59 AM

oh noble technocolonialists educating the poor uninformed on grown-up internet politics.  what a joke.

Teresa Peters  –  Oct 13, 2005 3:12 AM

Randy, Thanks for your comment, but you are off the mark. You may be interested to know that the CIPESA program is an African initiative, based in Kampala (that’s in Uganda), and staffed and led by Africans. Not only was the briefing drafted with significant input from key actors in Africa and reviewed by African experts, it has been welcomed in the African community, where they need information with local views in mind.

Sebastian Ricciardi  –  Oct 13, 2005 2:11 PM


Your article brings up a very important issue about the potential outcome of WSIS. This process represents an extraordinary opportunity for African stakeholders, who could be benefit in many ways from it.

However, it is worrying that the discussion keeps hinging around ICANN and the IP allocation issues. This matters are functioning pretty well under the current coordination model. In this model there are substantive participation from Africa stakeholders, and even more, last year AfriNic was put in operation, a major step for the continent infrastructure and communications future.

The WSIS main objective is to reduce poverty and bring development through ICTs. It is very unlikely that we would be able to reach that goal discussing about government oversight of ICANN or governement management of IP numbers. African stakeholders should be much more interested in real solutions to bridge the digital divide, capacity building programs, education and the streghtening of the current structures, etc.

Finally, yes, of course African stakeholders should care about ICANN. It represents the opportunity for a broad participation for all of them. I’ve been in Geneva for prepcom3 and I’ve participated in the ICANN process for the last 3 years. What I can tell you from that experience is that participation within ICANN is much more open and inclusive than those 15 minutes a day governments gives to the non-governmental participants.

Best Regards,


Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet



Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global


Sponsored byVerisign

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API