Law

Law / Recently Commented

Offering Price as Evidence of Bad Faith Domain Name Registration: A False (UDRP) Factor

Last Comment:

I have pointed out in earlier posts that some panelists disapprove of the business of speculating in domain names. There have been a succession of decisions expressing this view beginning with <crew.com> discussed below. Forfeiture has been justified with a mixture of theories. If the offering price is allegedly "excessive" or the domain name is passively held, or the respondent has renewed its registration after the mark is first used in commerce, the panelists find respondents have engaged in unlawful conduct and must forfeit their domain names. more

Industry Updates

Australian Government Steps In

  • By CSC
  • Dec 20, 2022

Continuing Danger for Internet Users – Unavailable Whois Data and DNS Abuse

Using IP Geolocation Data to Support Regulatory Compliance

Together for the Good of the Internet: eco Complaints Office Registers More Reports Than Ever Before

  • By eco
  • Apr 14, 2021

Thinking Outside the Box – Protecting Non-Music Brands’ IP on Digital Music Services

  • By CSC
  • Oct 14, 2020

The High Cost Of Privacy In A Post-GDPR World

Why UDRP Panelists Must Follow the Policy: A Look at the Devex.org Decision

Why the Record Number of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking UDRP Filings in 2016?

2016 U.S. Election: An Internet Forecast

Afilias Says “No” to SOPA

Verisign and Coalition for ICANN Transparency, Inc. (“CFIT”) Resolve Litigation

AusRegistry Int. and Crowell & Moring Join Forces to Support New Top-Level Domain Applicants

Comments on ICANN’s IRT Final Report

  • By .ORG
  • Jul 14, 2009
View More